The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement-Device-Independent Entanglement Witnesses for All Entangled Quantum States
Open accessAbstract
The problem of demonstrating entanglement is central to quantum information processing applications. Resorting to standard entanglement witnesses requires one to perfectly trust the implementation of the measurements to be performed on the entangled state, which may be an unjustified assumption. Inspired by the recent work of F. Buscemi [Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 200401 (2012)], we introduce the concept of measurement-device-independent entanglement witnesses (MDI-EWs), which allow one to demonstrate entanglement of all entangled quantum states with untrusted measurement apparatuses. We show how to systematically obtain such MDI-EWs from standard entanglement witnesses. Our construction leads to MDI-EWs that are loss tolerant and can be implemented with current technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model
Werner, R. F. (1989) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.40.4277 · Cited by 4,062
Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy
Bell, J. S., & Aspect, A. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815676 · Cited by 1,261
On the role of entanglement in quantum-computational speed-up
Jozsa, R., & Linden, N. (2003) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2002.1097 · Cited by 839
Cited by
Brunner, N., Cavalcanti, D., Pironio, S., Scarani, V., & Wehner, S. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.419 · Cited by 2,688
High-rate measurement-device-independent quantum cryptography
Pirandola, S., Ottaviani, C., Spedalieri, G., Weedbrook, C., Braunstein, S. L., Lloyd, S., Gehring, T., Jacobsen, C. S., & Andersen, U. L. (2015) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.83 · Cited by 476
Self-testing of quantum systems: a review
Šupić, I., & Bowles, J. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-09-30-337 · Cited by 365
Loss-tolerant measurement-device-independent quantum random number generation
Cao, Z., Zhou, H., & Ma, X. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/12/125011 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Branciard, C., Rosset, D., Liang, Y.-C., & Gisin, N.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2013-02-06
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 060405-060405
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2085897154
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement-Device-Independent Entanglement Witnesses for All Entangled Quantum States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.110.060405
- The paper
- Branciard, C., Rosset, D., Liang, Y.-C., & Gisin, N. (2013). Measurement-Device-Independent Entanglement Witnesses for All Entangled Quantum States. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.110.060405
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
