Cited by 476Quantum Information and CryptographyWireless Communication Security TechniquesQuantum optics and atomic interactions

High-rate measurement-device-independent quantum cryptography

Open access
Pirandola, Stefano, Ottaviani, Carlo, Spedalieri, Gaetana, Weedbrook, Christian, Braunstein, Samuel L., Lloyd, Seth, Gehring, Tobias, Jacobsen, Christian S. +1 more·2015·Nature Photonics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphoton.2015.83

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DI-QKD is difficult to implement and its performance in a practical scenario is still limited because it requires loophole-free Bell inequality violations, which necessitate high-quality entanglement among distant parties and near-perfect quantum detection.

    “However, DI-QKD is difficult to implement and its performance, on a practical scenario, are still limited [43] because it requires loophole-free Bell inequality violations, which necessitate high-quality entanglement among distant parties and near-perfect quantum detection, something current technologies cannot still provide in full [57], or at least not under commonly accepted practicality assum”

    From Quantum Computing: Vision and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [57]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pirandola, S., Ottaviani, C., Spedalieri, G., Weedbrook, C., Braunstein, S. L., Lloyd, S., Gehring, T., Jacobsen, C. S., & Andersen, U. L.
Affiliations
  • University of York (GB)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Pirandola, Stefano
Venue
Nature Photonics
Published
2015-05-25
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
397-402
ISSN
  • 1749-4885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-4893
OpenAlex
W1622088883
Cited by
476
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
47.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Photonics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-CHRI-0006)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/M013472/1, EP/J00796X/1, EP/L011298/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Communication Security Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Keywords
measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution, continuous-variable quantum key distribution, metropolitan quantum networks, untrusted relay, optical fibre transmission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review