The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
No-Hair Theorem for the Galileon
Open accessAbstract
We consider a Galileon field coupled to gravity. The standard no-hair theorems do not apply because of the Galileon's peculiar derivative interactions. We prove that, nonetheless, static spherically symmetric black holes cannot sustain nontrivial Galileon profiles. Our theorem holds for trivial boundary conditions and for cosmological ones, and regardless of whether there are nonminimal couplings between the Galileon and gravity of the covariant Galileon type.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Strong interactions and stability in the DGP model
Luty, M. A., Porrati, M., & Rattazzi, R. (2003) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/09/029 · Cited by 672
Cited by
Beyond the cosmological standard model
Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J., & Trodden, M. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002 · Cited by 1,231
Asymptotically flat black holes with scalar hair: A review
Herdeiro, C. A. R., & Radu, E. (2015) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271815420146 · Cited by 729
A systematic approach to generalisations of General Relativity and their cosmological implications
Heisenberg, L. (2019) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.006 · Cited by 419
“In [289], this was done using the properties of the conserved current associated with the shift symmetry.”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Hui, L., & Nicolis, A.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2013-06-14
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 241104-241104
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W1982257579
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
