The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Near-Unity Coupling Efficiency of a Quantum Emitter to a Photonic Crystal Waveguide
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
To date the highest number of photons generated in a Boson sampling experiment have been through the demultiplexing of a single quantum dot single-photon source.
“To date the highest number of photons generated in a Boson sampling experiment have been through the demultiplexing of a single QD-SPS [57-59]: Fig.5b .”
From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [58]
An integration of Si-photonic circuits with SNSPDs by using the μm-scale flip-chip process allows on-chip measurements of non-classical light.
“An integration of Si-photonic circuits with SNSPDs by using the µm-scale flip-chip process. It allows on-chip measurements of non-classical light.”
From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [58]
5-photon QD Boson sampling was implemented with a high rate of 4 Hz, using near-optimal single-photons from a single QD-SPS actively de-multiplexed into 5 spatial modes and scattered in an ultra-low-loss 9×9 photonic circuit.
“implementation of 5-photon QD Boson sampling with a high rate of 4 Hz. Near-optimal single-photons emitted from a single QD-SPS are actively de-multiplexed into 5 spatial modes, and the 5 photons are scattered in a ultra-low-loss 9×9 photonic circuit.”
From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [58]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing
Bennett, C. H., & Brassard, G. (2014) · Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2014.05.025 · Cited by 8,299
A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Milburn, G. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35051009 · Cited by 5,880
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 48
- C. H. Bennett, 1984, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing, Bangalore, India
- 10.1038/nphoton.2010.312 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphoton.2009.287 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.250501 · DOI
- 10.1109/3.974 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphys708 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.2999588 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.173902 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1238169 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature08134 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4710 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature11361 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1364/OL.30.002001 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep01901 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.093604 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphoton.2012.181 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphoton.2013.48 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature03804 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature13188 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.205437 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.023902 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.113903 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.3294298 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.3446873 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.3683541 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.2.011014 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.4742743 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.125431 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.045316 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.205324 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.1577828 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.195315 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphys1780 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.167404 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.166801 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.203603 · DOI
- 10.1038/nnano.2010.6 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature06230 · DOI
- 10.1364/OE.16.012154 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.3205452 · DOI
- 10.1364/OL.32.002638 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1185080 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.165103 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.081304 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.2103397 · DOI
- 10.1038/nnano.2012.262 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.093602 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.3672034 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Solid-state single-photon emitters
Aharonovich, I., Englund, D., & Toth, M. (2016) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2016.186 · Cited by 1,786
Integrated photonic quantum technologies
Wang, J., Sciarrino, F., Laing, A., & Thompson, M. G. (2020) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0532-1 · Cited by 1,576
Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures
Lodahl, P., Mahmoodian, S., & Stobbe, S. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.347 · Cited by 1,465
Self-citationDeterministic photon–emitter coupling in chiral photonic circuits
Söllner, I., Mahmoodian, S., Hansen, S. L., Midolo, L., Javadi, A., Kiršanskė, G., Pregnolato, T., El-Ella, H., Lee, E. H., Song, J. D., et al. (2015) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.159 · Cited by 654
Self-citationA bright and fast source of coherent single photons
Tomm, N., Javadi, A., Antoniadis, N. O., Najer, D., Löbl, M. C., Korsch, A. R., Schott, R., Valentin, S. R., Wieck, A. D., Ludwig, A., et al. (2021) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-020-00831-x · Cited by 608
Self-citationHybrid integration methods for on-chip quantum photonics
Kim, J.-H., Aghaeimeibodi, S., Carolan, J., Englund, D., & Waks, E. (2020) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.384118 · Cited by 272
Nanophotonic control of circular dipole emission
le Feber, B., Rotenberg, N., & Kuipers, L. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7695 · Cited by 256
Generation and sampling of quantum states of light in a silicon chip
Paesani, S., Ding, Y., Santagati, R., Chakhmakhchyan, L., Vigliar, C., Rottwitt, K., Oxenløwe, L. K., Wang, J., Thompson, M. G., & Laing, A. (2019) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0567-8 · Cited by 214
Material platforms for integrated quantum photonics
Bogdanov, S., Shalaginov, M. Y., Boltasseva, A., & Shalaev, V. M. (2017) · Optical Materials Express · doi:10.1364/ome.7.000111 · Cited by 176
Two-photon interference from a bright single-photon source at telecom wavelengths
Kim, J.-H., Cai, T., Richardson, C. J. K., Leavitt, R. P., & Waks, E. (2016) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.3.000577 · Cited by 144
Chip-scale nonlinear photonics for quantum light generation
Moody, G., Chang, L., Steiner, T. J., & Bowers, J. E. (2020) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/5.0020684 · Cited by 117
Unsleber, S., McCutcheon, D. P. S., Dambach, M., Lermer, M., Gregersen, N., Höfling, S., Mørk, J., Schneider, C., & Kamp, M. (2015) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.075413 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Arcari, M., Söllner, I., Javadi, A., Lindskov Hansen, S., Mahmoodian, S., Liu, J., Thyrrestrup, H., Lee, E. H., Song, J. D., Stobbe, S., & Lodahl, P.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2014-08-29
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 9
- ISSN
- 0031-9007
- 1079-7114
- Cited by
- 600
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
