Scalable Boson Sampling with Time-Bin Encoding Using a Loop-Based Architecture
Open accessAbstract
We present an architecture for arbitrarily scalable boson sampling using two nested fiber loops. The architecture has fixed experimental complexity, irrespective of the size of the desired interferometer, whose scale is limited only by fiber and switch loss rates. The architecture employs time-bin encoding, whereby the incident photons form a pulse train, which enters the loops. Dynamically controlled loop coupling ratios allow the construction of the arbitrary linear optics interferometers required for boson sampling. The architecture employs only a single point of interference and may thus be easier to stabilize than other approaches. The scheme has polynomial complexity and could be realized using demonstrated present-day technologies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
By encoding quantum information in sequential pulses of light, large and highly entangled states can be processed with a relatively small number of optical components.
“By encoding quantum information in sequential pulses of light—effectively multiplexing a small number of optical channels to process information on a large number of modes20—large and highly entangled states can be processed with a relatively small number of optical components.”
From Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor (2022) · cites this paper as [20]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 141
- Authors
- Motes, K. R., Gilchrist, A., Dowling, J. P., & Rohde, P. P.
- Affiliations
- Macquarie University (AU)
- Louisiana State University (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2014-09-18
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 120501-120501
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2009630586
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 14.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR)
- Army Research Office (ARO)
- National Science Foundation (NSF)
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Engineered Quantum Systems (CE110001013)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- boson sampling, time-bin encoding, fiber loop, scalable quantum computing, polynomial complexity, photonics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review