The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Composable Security Proof for Continuous-Variable Quantum Key Distribution with Coherent States
Open accessAbstract
We give the first composable security proof for continuous-variable quantum key distribution with coherent states against collective attacks. Crucially, in the limit of large blocks the secret key rate converges to the usual value computed from the Holevo bound. Combining our proof with either the de Finetti theorem or the postselection technique then shows the security of the protocol against general attacks, thereby confirming the long-standing conjecture that Gaussian attacks are optimal asymptotically in the composable security framework. We expect that our parameter estimation procedure, which does not rely on any assumption about the quantum state being measured, will find applications elsewhere, for instance, for the reliable quantification of continuous-variable entanglement in finite-size settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inseparability Criterion for Continuous Variable Systems
Duan, L.-M., Giedke, G., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.2722 · Cited by 2,064
Estimation of entropy and mutual information
Paninski, L. (2003) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976603321780272 · Cited by 1,442
A Fully Quantum Asymptotic Equipartition Property
Tomamichel, M., Colbeck, R., & Renner, R. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2009.2032797 · Cited by 356
Cited by
Advances in quantum cryptography
Pirandola, S., Andersen, U. L., Banchi, L., Berta, M., Bunandar, D., Colbeck, R., Englund, D., Gehring, T., Lupo, C., Ottaviani, C., et al. (2020) · Advances in Optics and Photonics · doi:10.1364/aop.361502 · Cited by 2,033
Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices
Xu, F., Ma, X., Zhang, Q., Lo, H.-K., & Pan, J.-W. (2020) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.025002 · Cited by 1,543
High-rate measurement-device-independent quantum cryptography
Pirandola, S., Ottaviani, C., Spedalieri, G., Weedbrook, C., Braunstein, S. L., Lloyd, S., Gehring, T., Jacobsen, C. S., & Andersen, U. L. (2015) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.83 · Cited by 476
Metadata
- Authors
- Leverrier, A.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2015-02-19
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 070501-070501
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W1996704313
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 27.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Composable Security Proof for Continuous-Variable Quantum Key Distribution with Coherent States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.114.070501
- The paper
- Leverrier, A. (2015). Composable Security Proof for Continuous-Variable Quantum Key Distribution with Coherent States. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.114.070501
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.