Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 241

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Observation of Energy and Baseline Dependent Reactor Antineutrino Disappearance in the RENO Experiment

Open access
Choi, J. H., Choi, W. Q., Choi, Y., Jang, H. I., Jang, J. S., Jeon, E. J., Joo, K. K., Kim, B. R., Kim, H. S., Kim, J. Y., Kim, S. B., Kim, S. Y., Kim, W., Kim, Y. D., Ko, Y., Lee, D. H., Lim, I. T., Pac, M. Y., Park, I. G., Park, J. S., Park, R. G., Seo, H., Seo, S. H., Seon, Y. G., Shin, C. D., Siyeon, K., Yang, J. H., Yeo, I. S., Yu, I., RENO Collaboration·2016·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

The RENO experiment has analyzed about 500 live days of data to observe an energy dependent disappearance of reactor ${\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}}_{e}$ by comparing their prompt signal spectra measured in two identical near and far detectors. In the period between August of 2011 and January of 2013, the far (near) detector observed 31 541 (290 775) electron antineutrino candidate events with a background fraction of 4.9% (2.8%). The measured prompt spectra show an excess of reactor ${\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}}_{e}$ around 5 MeV relative to the prediction from a most commonly used model. A clear energy and baseline dependent disappearance of reactor ${\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}}_{e}$ is observed in the deficit of the observed number of ${\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}}_{e}$. Based on the measured far-to-near ratio of prompt spectra, we obtain ${\mathrm{sin}}^{2}2{\ensuremath{\theta}}_{13}=0.082\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.009(\text{stat})\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.006(\text{syst})$ and $|\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}{m}_{ee}^{2}|=[2.6{2}_{\ensuremath{-}0.23}^{+0.21}(\text{stat}{)}_{\ensuremath{-}0.13}^{+0.12}(\text{syst})]\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{eV}}^{2}$.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.116.211801

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 241

Metadata

Authors
Choi, J. H., Choi, W. Q., Choi, Y., Jang, H. I., Jang, J. S., Jeon, E. J., Joo, K. K., Kim, B. R., Kim, H. S., Kim, J. Y., Kim, S. B., Kim, S. Y., Kim, W., Kim, Y. D., Ko, Y., Lee, D. H., Lim, I. T., Pac, M. Y., Park, I. G., Park, J. S., Park, R. G., Seo, H., Seo, S. H., Seon, Y. G., Shin, C. D., Siyeon, K., Yang, J. H., Yeo, I. S., Yu, I., & RENO Collaboration
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2016-05-24
Volume
116
Issue
21
Pages
211801-211801
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2407789814
Cited by
241
References
1
FWCI
22.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observation of Energy and Baseline Dependent Reactor Antineutrino Disappearance in the RENO Experiment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.116.211801
The paper
Choi, J. H., Choi, W. Q., Choi, Y., Jang, H. I., Jang, J. S., Jeon, E. J., Joo, K. K., Kim, B. R., Kim, H. S., Kim, J. Y., Kim, S. B., Kim, S. Y., Kim, W., Kim, Y. D., Ko, Y., Lee, D. H., Lim, I. T., Pac, M. Y., Park, I. G., . . . RENO Collaboration. (2016). Observation of Energy and Baseline Dependent Reactor Antineutrino Disappearance in the RENO Experiment. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.116.211801

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.