The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Observation of Energy and Baseline Dependent Reactor Antineutrino Disappearance in the RENO Experiment
Open accessAbstract
The RENO experiment has analyzed about 500 live days of data to observe an energy dependent disappearance of reactor ${\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}}_{e}$ by comparing their prompt signal spectra measured in two identical near and far detectors. In the period between August of 2011 and January of 2013, the far (near) detector observed 31 541 (290 775) electron antineutrino candidate events with a background fraction of 4.9% (2.8%). The measured prompt spectra show an excess of reactor ${\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}}_{e}$ around 5 MeV relative to the prediction from a most commonly used model. A clear energy and baseline dependent disappearance of reactor ${\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}}_{e}$ is observed in the deficit of the observed number of ${\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}}_{e}$. Based on the measured far-to-near ratio of prompt spectra, we obtain ${\mathrm{sin}}^{2}2{\ensuremath{\theta}}_{13}=0.082\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.009(\text{stat})\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.006(\text{syst})$ and $|\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}{m}_{ee}^{2}|=[2.6{2}_{\ensuremath{-}0.23}^{+0.21}(\text{stat}{)}_{\ensuremath{-}0.13}^{+0.12}(\text{syst})]\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{eV}}^{2}$.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles
Maki, Z., Nakagawa, M., & Sakata, S. (1962) · Progress of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1143/ptp.28.870 · Cited by 3,355
Cited by
Neutrino Oscillations and Non-standard Interactions
Farzan, Y., & Tórtola, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2018.00010 · Cited by 363
Flavor structures of charged fermions and massive neutrinos
Xing, Z.-Z. (2020) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.02.001 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Choi, J. H., Choi, W. Q., Choi, Y., Jang, H. I., Jang, J. S., Jeon, E. J., Joo, K. K., Kim, B. R., Kim, H. S., Kim, J. Y., Kim, S. B., Kim, S. Y., Kim, W., Kim, Y. D., Ko, Y., Lee, D. H., Lim, I. T., Pac, M. Y., Park, I. G., Park, J. S., Park, R. G., Seo, H., Seo, S. H., Seon, Y. G., Shin, C. D., Siyeon, K., Yang, J. H., Yeo, I. S., Yu, I., & RENO Collaboration
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2016-05-24
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 211801-211801
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2407789814
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observation of Energy and Baseline Dependent Reactor Antineutrino Disappearance in the RENO Experiment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.116.211801
- The paper
- Choi, J. H., Choi, W. Q., Choi, Y., Jang, H. I., Jang, J. S., Jeon, E. J., Joo, K. K., Kim, B. R., Kim, H. S., Kim, J. Y., Kim, S. B., Kim, S. Y., Kim, W., Kim, Y. D., Ko, Y., Lee, D. H., Lim, I. T., Pac, M. Y., Park, I. G., . . . RENO Collaboration. (2016). Observation of Energy and Baseline Dependent Reactor Antineutrino Disappearance in the RENO Experiment. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.116.211801
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.