The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relating the Resource Theories of Entanglement and Quantum Coherence
Open accessAbstract
Quantum coherence and quantum entanglement represent two fundamental features of nonclassical systems that can each be characterized within an operational resource theory. In this Letter, we unify the resource theories of entanglement and coherence by studying their combined behavior in the operational setting of local incoherent operations and classical communication (LIOCC). Specifically, we analyze the coherence and entanglement trade-offs in the tasks of state formation and resource distillation. For pure states we identify the minimum coherence-entanglement resources needed to generate a given state, and we introduce a new LIOCC monotone that completely characterizes a state's optimal rate of bipartite coherence distillation. This result allows us to precisely quantify the difference in operational powers between global incoherent operations, LIOCC, and local incoherent operations without classical communication. Finally, a bipartite mixed state is shown to have distillable entanglement if and only if entanglement can be distilled by LIOCC, and we strengthen the well-known Horodecki criterion for distillability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, K. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.865 · Cited by 10,118
Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction
Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.3824 · Cited by 5,272
Information Theory: Coding Theorems for Discrete Memoryless Systems
Csiszár, I., & Körner, J. (2014) · REAL-EOD (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and the Information Center Oriental Collection) · Cited by 3,246
Baumgratz, T., Cramer, M., & Plenio, M. B. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.140401 · Cited by 2,741
Fidelity for Mixed Quantum States
Jozsa, R. (1994) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500349414552171 · Cited by 1,911
The ‘transition probability’ in the state space of a—algebra
Uhlmann, A. (1976) · Reports on Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1016/0034-4877(76)90060-4 · Cited by 1,649
Information Theory: Coding Theorems for Discrete Memoryless Systems
Csiszár, I., & Körner, J. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511921889 · Cited by 1,308
Mixed-state entanglement and distillation: Is there a ‘bound’ entanglement in nature?
Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, R. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.5239 · Cited by 1,208
The capacity of the quantum channel with general signal states
Holevo, A. S. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.651037 · Cited by 1,176
Sending classical information via noisy quantum channels
Schumacher, B., & Westmoreland, M. D. (1997) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.56.131 · Cited by 1,087
Metadata
- Authors
- Chitambar, E., & Hsieh, M.-H.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2016-07-08
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 020402-020402
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W1920749059
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 35.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relating the Resource Theories of Entanglement and Quantum Coherence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.117.020402
- The paper
- Chitambar, E., & Hsieh, M.-H. (2016). Relating the Resource Theories of Entanglement and Quantum Coherence. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.117.020402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.