Cited by 1,208Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum many-body systems

Mixed-state entanglement and distillation: Is there a ‘bound’ entanglement in nature?

Open access
Horodecki, Michał, Horodecki, Paweł, Horodecki, Ryszard·1998·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

It is shown that if a mixed state can be distilled to the singlet form it must violate partial transposition criterion [A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1413 (1996)]. It implies that there are two qualitatively different types of entanglement: ``free'' entanglement which is distillable, and ``bound'' entanglement which cannot be brought to the singlet form useful for quantum communication purposes. A possible physical meaning of the result is discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.80.5239

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For two three-dimensional systems, or more complicated ones, one can find states which are entangled but from which no maximally entangled state can be distilled (bound entangled).

    “An interesting feature of the theory of entanglement of mixed states is that for two three dimensional systems, or for more complicated ones, one can find states which are entangled, but from which no maximally entangled state can be distilled 10 (Horodecki, Horodecki and Horodecki, 1998).Such states are called bound entangled.”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Horodecki, Horodecki and Horodecki, 1998

  • In higher dimensions there exist entangled states that are not detected by the ppt criterion.

    “However, in higher dimensions there exist entangled states [39,40] that are not detected by the ppt criterion.”

    From Measures and dynamics of entangled states (2005) · cites this paper as [39]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Gdańsk (PL)
  • Gdańsk University of Technology (PL)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1998-06-15
Volume
80
Issue
24
Pages
5239-5242
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2003989474
Cited by
1,208
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 56
FWCI
39.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
bound entanglement, entanglement distillation, mixed-state entanglement, singlet state, quantum communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review