The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analytic and Nearly Optimal Self-Testing Bounds for the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt and Mermin Inequalities
Open accessAbstract
Self-testing refers to the phenomenon that certain extremal quantum correlations (almost) uniquely identify the quantum system under consideration. For instance, observing the maximal violation of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality certifies that the two parties share a singlet. While self-testing results are known for several classes of states, in many cases they are only applicable if the observed statistics are almost perfect, which makes them unsuitable for practical applications. Practically relevant self-testing bounds are much less common and moreover they all result from a single numerical method (with one exception which we discuss in detail). In this work we present a new technique for proving analytic self-testing bounds of practically relevant robustness. We obtain improved bounds for the case of self-testing the singlet using the CHSH inequality (in particular we show that nontrivial fidelity with the singlet can be achieved as long as the violation exceeds β^{*}=(16+14sqrt[2])/17≈2.11). In the case of self-testing the tripartite Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger state using the Mermin inequality, we derive a bound which not only improves on previously known results but turns out to be tight. We discuss other scenarios to which our technique can be immediately applied.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“whereas Bell’s inequality sets an experimental threshold of 2√2 and a theoretical threshold of √16 [56], [57], multipartite systems do not have fixed thresholds or strictly bounded metrics [32].”
From Mathematical proof of the Fisher-Escolà Q statistical distribution in quantum consciousness modeling (2025) · cites this paper as [32]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox
Bell, J. S. (1964) · Physics Physique Fizika · doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195 · Cited by 12,252
Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories
Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., & Holt, R. A. (1969) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.880 · Cited by 7,573
Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres
Hensen, B., Bernien, H., Dréau, A. E., Reiserer, A., Kalb, N., Blok, M. S., Ruitenberg, J., Vermeulen, R. F. L., Schouten, R. N., Abellán, C., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15759 · Cited by 2,852
Brunner, N., Cavalcanti, D., Pironio, S., Scarani, V., & Wehner, S. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.419 · Cited by 2,688
Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe
(1989) · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0849-4 · Cited by 1,632
Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks
Acín, A., Brunner, N., Gisin, N., Massar, S., Pironio, S., & Scarani, V. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.230501 · Cited by 1,537
Extreme quantum entanglement in a superposition of macroscopically distinct states
Mermin, N. D. (1990) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.65.1838 · Cited by 1,482
Most Tensor Problems Are NP-Hard
Hillar, C. J., & Lim, L. (2013) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2512329 · Cited by 1,194
Bell Inequalities for Arbitrarily High-Dimensional Systems
Collins, D., Gisin, N., Linden, N., Massar, S., & Popescu, S. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.040404 · Cited by 999
No Signaling and Quantum Key Distribution
Barrett, J., Hardy, L., & Kent, A. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.010503 · Cited by 916
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- V. Scarani, 2012, Acta Phys. Slovaca, 62, 347
- A. C. Doherty, 2008, Proceedings IEEE Computational Complexity ’08
- M. McKague, 2011, Proceedings TQC ’10, LNCS, 6519, 2011
- C. J. Hillar, 2013, J. ACM, 60, 45
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Self-testing of quantum systems: a review
Šupić, I., & Bowles, J. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-09-30-337 · Cited by 365
All pure bipartite entangled states can be self-tested
Coladangelo, A., Goh, K. T., & Scarani, V. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15485 · Cited by 205
Quantum fidelity measures for mixed states
Liang, Y.-C., Yeh, Y.-H., Mendonça, P. E. M. F., Teh, R. Y., Reid, M. D., & Drummond, P. D. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ab1ca4 · Cited by 203
Self-testing quantum states and measurements in the prepare-and-measure scenario
Tavakoli, A., Kaniewski, J., Vértesi, T., Rosset, D., & Brunner, N. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.062307 · Cited by 121
Self-testing of binary observables based on commutation
Kaniewski, J. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.062323 · Cited by 96
Self-testing multipartite entangled states through projections onto two systems
Šupić, I., Coladangelo, A., Augusiak, R., & Acín, A. (2018) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aad89b · Cited by 98
Self-testing mutually unbiased bases in the prepare-and-measure scenario
Farkas, M., & Kaniewski, J. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.032316 · Cited by 92
Self-testing nonprojective quantum measurements in prepare-and-measure experiments
Tavakoli, A., Smania, M., Vértesi, T., Brunner, N., & Bourennane, M. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw6664 · Cited by 95
Scalable Bell Inequalities for Qubit Graph States and Robust Self-Testing
Baccari, F., Augusiak, R., Šupić, I., Tura, J., & Acín, A. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.020402 · Cited by 94
Self-testing of Pauli observables for device-independent entanglement certification
Bowles, J., Šupić, I., Cavalcanti, D., & Acín, A. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.042336 · Cited by 88
Certifying the Building Blocks of Quantum Computers from Bell’s Theorem
Sekatski, P., Bancal, J.-D., Wagner, S., & Sangouard, N. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.180505 · Cited by 78
Self-Testing Entangled Measurements in Quantum Networks
Renou, M.-O., Kaniewski, J., & Brunner, N. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.250507 · Cited by 73
Ho, M., Sekatski, P., Tan, E. Y.-Z., Renner, R., Bancal, J.-D., & Sangouard, N. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.230502 · Cited by 67
Robust Self-Testing of Quantum Systems via Noncontextuality Inequalities
Bharti, K., Ray, M., Varvitsiotis, A., Warsi, N. A., Cabello, A., & Kwek, L. C. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.250403 · Cited by 59
Noise-Resistant Device-Independent Certification of Bell State Measurements
Bancal, J.-D., Sangouard, N., & Sekatski, P. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.250506 · Cited by 57
Experimental Optimal Verification of Entangled States Using Local Measurements
Zhang, W.-H., Zhang, C., Chen, Z., Peng, X.-X., Xu, X., Yin, P., Yu, S., Ye, X.-J., Han, Y., Xu, J., et al. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.030506 · Cited by 53
Genuine network quantum nonlocality and self-testing
Šupić, I., Bancal, J.-D., Cai, Y., & Brunner, N. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.022206 · Cited by 50
Device-independent secret sharing and a stronger form of Bell nonlocality
Moreno, G., Brito, S., Nery, R., & Chaves, R. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.052339 · Cited by 43
Device-independent characterization of quantum instruments
Wagner, S., Bancal, J.-D., Sangouard, N., & Sekatski, P. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-03-19-243 · Cited by 43
Device-Independent Certification of Genuinely Entangled Subspaces
Baccari, F., Augusiak, R., Šupić, I., & Acín, A. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.260507 · Cited by 37
Nonlocality for Generic Networks
Renou, M.-O., & Beigi, S. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.060401 · Cited by 40
Gómez, S., Máttar, A., Machuca, I., Gómez, E. S., Cavalcanti, D., Farías, O. J., Acín, A., & Lima, G. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.032108 · Cited by 30
Sample-Efficient Device-Independent Quantum State Verification and Certification
Gočanin, A., Šupić, I., & Dakić, B. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.010317 · Cited by 39
Experimentally Robust Self-testing for Bipartite and Tripartite Entangled States
Zhang, W.-H., Chen, G., Peng, X.-X., Ye, X.-J., Yin, P., Xiao, Y., Hou, Z., Cheng, Z.-D., Wu, Y.-C., Xu, J., et al. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.240402 · Cited by 32
Optimization of device-independent witnesses of entanglement depth from two-body correlators
Tura, J., Aloy, A., Baccari, F., Acín, A., Lewenstein, M., & Augusiak, R. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.032307 · Cited by 32
Robust self-testing of two-qubit states
Coopmans, T. J., Kaniewski, J., & Schaffner, C. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.052123 · Cited by 33
Experimental Robust Self-Testing of the State Generated by a Quantum Network
Agresti, I., Polacchi, B., Poderini, D., Polino, E., Suprano, A., Šupić, I., Bowles, J., Carvacho, G., Cavalcanti, D., & Sciarrino, F. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.020346 · Cited by 28
Chained Bell Inequality Experiment with High-Efficiency Measurements
Tan, T. R., Wan, Y., Erickson, S. D., Bierhorst, P., Kienzler, D., Glancy, S., Knill, E. H., Leibfried, D. G., & Wineland, D. J. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.130403 · Cited by 28
Experimental Realization of Robust Self-Testing of Bell State Measurements
Zhang, W.-H., Chen, G., Peng, X.-X., Ye, X.-J., Yin, P., Xu, X., Xu, J., Li, C., & Guo, G. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.090402 · Cited by 27
Experimental demonstration of robust self-testing for bipartite entangled states
Zhang, W.-H., Chen, G., Yin, P., Peng, X.-X., Hu, X., Hou, Z., Zhou, Z., Yu, S., Ye, X.-J., Zhou, Z., et al. (2018) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-018-0120-0 · Cited by 29
Chen, S.-L., Ku, H.-Y., Zhou, W., Tura, J., & Chen, Y.-N. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-09-28-552 · Cited by 26
Coladangelo, A. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.052115 · Cited by 24
Aloy, A., Fadel, M., & Brugués, J. T. I. (2020) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/abe15e · Cited by 26
Self-testing with finite statistics enabling the certification of a quantum network link
Bancal, J.-D., Redeker, K., Sekatski, P., Rosenfeld, W., & Sangouard, N. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-03-02-401 · Cited by 33
Kaniewski, J. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033420 · Cited by 25
Robust Self-Testing of Multiparticle Entanglement
Wu, D., Zhao, Q., Gu, X., Zhong, H.-S., Zhou, Y., Peng, L.-C., Qin, J., Luo, Y.-H., Chen, K., Li, L., et al. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.230503 · Cited by 22
Bian, Z., Majumdar, A. S., Jebarathinam, C., Wang, K., Xiao, L., Zhan, X., Zhang, Y.-S., & Xue, P. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.020301 · Cited by 19
Network nonlocality via rigidity of token counting and color matching
Renou, M.-O., & Beigi, S. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.022408 · Cited by 26
How post-selection affects device-independent claims under the fair sampling assumption
Orsucci, D., Bancal, J.-D., Sangouard, N., & Sekatski, P. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-03-02-238 · Cited by 21
Self-testing maximally-dimensional genuinely entangled subspaces within the stabilizer formalism
Makuta, O., & Augusiak, R. (2021) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/abee40 · Cited by 22
Sarkar, S., & Augusiak, R. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.032416 · Cited by 21
Device-independent characterization of entanglement based on bell nonlocality
Chen, G., Zhang, W.-H., Yin, P., Li, C., & Guo, G. (2021) · Fundamental Research · doi:10.1016/j.fmre.2021.01.004 · Cited by 21
An elegant scheme of self-testing for multipartite Bell inequalities
Panwar, E., Pandya, P., & Wieśniak, M. (2023) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00735-3 · Cited by 23
Device-independent quantum key distribution with realistic single-photon source implementations
González-Ruiz, E. M., Rivera-Dean, J., Cenni, M. F. B., Sørensen, A. S., Acín, A., & Oudot, E. (2024) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.497935 · Cited by 18
Sun, Y.-N., Liu, Z., Bowles, J., Chen, G., Xu, X.-Y., Tang, J., Li, C., & Guo, G. (2020) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.396932 · Cited by 16
Certifying the Topology of Quantum Networks: Theory and Experiment
Weinbrenner, L. T., Prasannan, N., Hansenne, K., Denker, S., Sperling, J., Brecht, B., Silberhorn, C., & Gühne, O. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.240802 · Cited by 15
Han, Y.-G., Li, Z., Wang, Y., & Zhu, H. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00499-8 · Cited by 16
Graph-Theoretic Approach for Self-Testing in Bell Scenarios
Bharti, K., Ray, M., Xu, Z.-P., Hayashi, M., Kwek, L., & Cabello, A. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.030344 · Cited by 11
Semi-device-independent characterization of quantum measurements under a minimum overlap assumption
Shi, W., Cai, Y., Brask, J. B., Zbinden, H., & Brunner, N. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.042108 · Cited by 14
Certified quantum measurement of Majorana fermions
Irfan, A. A., Mayer, K., Ortíz, G., & Knill, E. H. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.032106 · Cited by 16
Maity, A. G., Mal, S., Jebarathinam, C., & Majumdar, A. S. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.062604 · Cited by 14
Shaleena, A. S., Mukherjee, S., & Pan, A. K. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.012411 · Cited by 14
Experimental comparison of tomography and self-testing in certifying entanglement
Goh, K. T., Perumangatt, C., Lee, Z. X., Ling, A., & Scarani, V. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.022305 · Cited by 14
Maximal violation of a broad class of Bell inequalities and its implication on self-testing
Jebarathinam, C., Hung, J.-C., Chen, S.-L., & Liang, Y.-C. (2019) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.1.033073 · Cited by 13
Self-testing of a single quantum system from theory to experiment
Hu, X., Xie, Y., Arora, A. S., Ai, M.-Z., Bharti, K., Zhang, J., Wu, W., Chen, P.-X., Cui, J., Liu, B., et al. (2023) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00769-7 · Cited by 13
Li, J., Liu, T.-J., Wang, S., Jebarathinam, C., & Wang, Q. (2019) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.27.013559 · Cited by 13
Toward the Device-Independent Certification of a Quantum Memory.
Sekatski, P., Bancal, J., Ioannou, M., Afzelius, M., & Brunner, N. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.170802 · Cited by 13
Murta, G., & Baccari, F. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.140201 · Cited by 12
Robust Approach for Time-Bin-Encoded Photonic Quantum Information Protocols
White, S., Polino, E., Ghafari, F., Joch, D. J., Villegas-Aguilar, L., Shalm, L. K., Verma, V. B., Huber, M., & Tischler, N. (2025) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.180802 · Cited by 14
Closing the Locality and Detection Loopholes in Multiparticle Entanglement Self-Testing.
Wu, D., Zhao, Q., Wang, C., Huang, L., Jiang, Y.-F., Bai, B., Zhou, Y., Gu, X.-M., Liu, F.-M., Mao, Y.-Q., et al. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.250401 · Cited by 10
Quantum correlations on the no-signaling boundary: self-testing and more
Chen, K.-S., Tabia, G. N. M., Jebarathinam, C., Mal, S., Wu, J.-Y., & Liang, Y.-C. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-07-11-1054 · Cited by 16
Lee, S., Park, J., Kim, J., & Noh, C. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.012134 · Cited by 11
Near-Maximal Two-Photon Entanglement for Optical Quantum Communication at 2.1μm
Dada, A. C., Kaniewski, J., Gawith, C. B. E., Lavery, M. P. J., Hadfield, R. H., Faccio, D., & Clerici, M. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.16.l051005 · Cited by 11
What is the minimum CHSH score certifying that a state resembles the singlet?
Valcarce, X., Sekatski, P., Orsucci, D., Oudot, E., Bancal, J.-D., & Sangouard, N. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-03-23-246 · Cited by 13
Zhang, C., Zhang, W.-H., Sekatski, P., Bancal, J.-D., Zwerger, M. J., Yin, P., Li, G., Peng, X.-X., Chen, L., Han, Y., et al. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.190503 · Cited by 10
Self-testing two-qubit maximally entangled states from generalized Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt tests
Valcarce, X., Zivy, J., Sangouard, N., & Sekatski, P. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.013049 · Cited by 9
Authenticated teleportation with one-sided trust
Unnikrishnan, A., & Markham, D. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.032314 · Cited by 9
Płodzień, M., Chwedeńczuk, J., Lewenstein, M., & Rajchel-Mieldzioć, G. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.032428 · Cited by 11
Complete Self-Testing of a System of Remote Superconducting Qubits
Storz, S., Kulikov, A., Schär, J., Barizien, V., Valcarce, X., Berterottière, F., Sangouard, N., Bancal, J.-D., & Wallraff, A. J. (2025) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/nv7d-k3wr · Cited by 18
Self-Testing of Symmetric Three-Qubit States
Li, X., Wang, Y., Han, Y.-G., Qin, S., Gao, F., & Wen, Q. (2020) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2020.2968994 · Cited by 10
Advances of Quantum Key Distribution and Network Nonlocality
Geng, M. (2025) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e27090950 · Cited by 7
Analytic robustness bound for self-testing of the singlet with two binary measurements
Li, X., Wang, Y., Han, Y.-G., Qin, S., Gao, F., & Wen, Q. (2019) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.36.000457 · Cited by 7
Hierarchy of Multipartite Nonlocality and Device-Independent Effect Witnesses
Bierhorst, P., & Prakash, J. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.250201 · Cited by 7
Bell’s inequality, generalized concurrence and entanglement in qubits
Chang, P.-Y., Chu, S.-K., & Ma, C. (2019) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x19500325 · Cited by 8
Scalable determination of multipartite entanglement in quantum networks
Kao, W., Huang, C.-Y., Tsai, T.-J., Chen, S.-H., Sun, S.-Y., Li, Y., Liao, T., Chuu, C., Lu, H., & Li, C. (2024) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-024-00867-0 · Cited by 10
Device-independent quantum key distribution beyond qubits
Rivera-Dean, J., Steffinlongo, A., Parker-Sánchez, N., Acín, A., & Oudot, E. (2025) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/add8b3 · Cited by 6
Self-testing of genuine multipartite entangled states without network assistance
Adhikary, R., Mishra, A., & Rahaman, R. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.l010401 · Cited by 8
Paul, R., Sasmal, S., & Pan, A. K. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.012444 · Cited by 6
Quantifying unknown entanglement by neural networks
Lin, X., Chen, Z., & Wei, Z. (2023) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-023-04068-0 · Cited by 6
Experimental self-testing for photonic graph states
Xu, J.-M., Zhou, Q. F., Yang, Y.-X., Cheng, Z.-M., Xu, X.-Y., Ren, Z., Wang, X., & Wang, H. (2021) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.446154 · Cited by 6
Experimental verification of a new Bell-type inequality
Zhao, J., Cao, L., Yang, Y., Li, Y., & Lu, H.-X. (2018) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2018.03.013 · Cited by 6
Constructing multipartite Bell inequalities from stabilizers
Zhao, Q., & Zhou, Y. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.043215 · Cited by 5
Self-testing of different entanglement resources via fixed measurement settings
Li, X., Wang, Y., Han, Y.-G., & Zhu, S. N. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.052418 · Cited by 6
Bock, M., Sekatski, P., Bancal, J.-D., Kucera, S., Bauer, T., Sangouard, N., Becher, C., & Eschner, J. (2024) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-024-00859-0 · Cited by 5
Device-independent characterizations of a shared quantum state independent of any Bell inequalities
Wei, Z., & Sikora, J. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.032103 · Cited by 5
Scalable noncontextuality inequalities and certification of multiqubit quantum systems
Santos, R., Jebarathinam, C., & Augusiak, R. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.012431 · Cited by 5
Machine-learning-based device-independent certification of quantum networks
d'Alessandro, N., Polacchi, B., Moreno, G., Polino, E., Chaves, R., Agresti, I., & Sciarrino, F. (2023) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.023016 · Cited by 5
Experimental full calibration of quantum devices in a semi-device-independent way
Li, G.-C., Yin, Z., Zhang, W.-H., Chen, L., Yin, P., Peng, X.-X., Hong, X.-S., Chen, G., Li, C., & Guo, G. (2023) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.502274 · Cited by 5
Mathematical proof of the Fisher-Escolà Q statistical distribution in quantum consciousness modeling
Escolà-Gascón, Á., & Benito-León, J. (2025) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2025.04.025 · Cited by 4
Analytic semi-device-independent entanglement quantification for bipartite quantum states
Wei, Z., & Lin, L. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.032215 · Cited by 4
Self-testing of genuine multipartite non-local and non-maximally entangled states
Adhikary, R. (2024) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2024.129731 · Cited by 4
Experimental certification of nonprojective quantum measurements under a minimum overlap assumption
Fan, Q., Ma, M.-Y., Sun, Y.-N., Su, Q.-P., & Yang, C. (2022) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.469225 · Cited by 4
Wei, S.-H., Guo, F.-Z., Li, X., & Wen, Q. (2019) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/28/7/070304 · Cited by 4
Zhang, X., & Zhao, Q. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033400 · Cited by 4
Device-independent quantum authorization based on the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt game
Faleiro, R., & Goulão, M. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.022430 · Cited by 4
Singh, R. K., Sasmal, S., & Pan, A. K. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/x6ct-vmnx · Cited by 4
Self-guided method to search maximal Bell violations for unknown quantum states
Yang, L.-K., Chen, G., Zhang, W.-H., Peng, X.-X., Yu, S., Ye, X.-J., Li, C., & Guo, G. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.052310 · Cited by 3
Trusted quantum remote sensing based on self-testing of entangled states
Peng, X.-X., Zhang, W.-H., Yin, P., Li, G., Chen, L., Chen, G., Li, C., & Guo, G. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.032615 · Cited by 3
Quantum value for a family of I3322 -like Bell functionals
Gigena, N., & Kaniewski, J. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.012401 · Cited by 6
Nonlocal correlations in quantum networks distributed with different entangled states
Hsu, L. (2024) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ad313c · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaniewski, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Kaniewski, Jędrzej
- ORCID
- Kaniewski, Jędrzej
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2016-08-11
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 070402-070402
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2344582723
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 9.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- European Research Council (337603)
- Det Frie Forskningsråd
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (PP00P2_150734)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Keywords
- self-testing, CHSH inequality, Mermin inequality, singlet state, GHZ states, quantum correlations, analytic bounds, robustness, device-independent quantum cryptography, quantum fidelity, Bell nonlocality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review