Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stochastic and Resolvable Gravitational Waves from Ultralight Bosons

Open access
Brito, Richard, Ghosh, Shrobana, Barausse, Enrico, Berti, Emanuele, Cardoso, Vitor, Dvorkin, Irina, Klein, Antoine, Pani, Paolo·2017·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

Ultralight scalar fields around spinning black holes can trigger superradiant instabilities, forming a long-lived bosonic condensate outside the horizon. We use numerical solutions of the perturbed field equations and astrophysical models of massive and stellar-mass black hole populations to compute, for the first time, the stochastic gravitational-wave background from these sources. In optimistic scenarios the background is observable by Advanced LIGO and LISA for field masses ${m}_{s}$ in the range $\ensuremath{\sim}[2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}13},{10}^{\ensuremath{-}12}]$ and $\ensuremath{\sim}5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}[{10}^{\ensuremath{-}19},{10}^{\ensuremath{-}16}]\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$, respectively, and it can affect the detectability of resolvable sources. Our estimates suggest that an analysis of the stochastic background limits from LIGO O1 might already be used to marginally exclude axions with mass $\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}12.5}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$. Semicoherent searches with Advanced LIGO (LISA) should detect $\ensuremath{\sim}15(5)$ to 200(40) resolvable sources for scalar field masses $3\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}13}$ $({10}^{\ensuremath{-}17})\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$. LISA measurements of massive BH spins could either rule out bosons in the range $\ensuremath{\sim}[{10}^{\ensuremath{-}18},2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}13}]\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$, or measure ${m}_{s}$ with 10% accuracy in the range $\ensuremath{\sim}[{10}^{\ensuremath{-}17},{10}^{\ensuremath{-}13}]\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.119.131101

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Brito, R., Ghosh, S., Barausse, E., Berti, E., Cardoso, V., Dvorkin, I., Klein, A., & Pani, P.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2017-09-27
Volume
119
Issue
13
Pages
131101-131101
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2624674605
Cited by
223
References
4
FWCI
12.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stochastic and Resolvable Gravitational Waves from Ultralight Bosons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.119.131101
The paper
Brito, R., Ghosh, S., Barausse, E., Berti, E., Cardoso, V., Dvorkin, I., Klein, A., & Pani, P. (2017). Stochastic and Resolvable Gravitational Waves from Ultralight Bosons. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.119.131101

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.