The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-Platform Verification of Intermediate Scale Quantum Devices
Open accessAbstract
We describe a protocol for cross-platform verification of quantum simulators and quantum computers. We show how to measure directly the overlap Tr[ρ_{1}ρ_{2}] and the purities Tr[ρ_{1,2}^{2}], and thus a fidelity of two, possibly mixed, quantum states ρ_{1} and ρ_{2} prepared in separate experimental platforms. We require only local measurements in randomized product bases, which are communicated classically. As a proof of principle, we present the measurement of experiment-theory fidelities for entangled 10-qubit quantum states in a trapped ion quantum simulator.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Alternatively, one can use randomized measurements to measure the overlap Tr ( ρ 1 ρ 2 ) of two density matrices ρ 1 , ρ 2 (Elben et al. , 2020, 2019; van Enk and Beenakker, 2012).”
From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Elben et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“Using randomized measurements (Elben et al. , 2020), the kernel can be computed in a time that scales linearly with the dataset size D , which allows for processing large datasets with quantum computers (Haug et al. , 2021c).”
From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Elben et al. , 2020
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
Preskill, J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · Cited by 8,830
A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation
Efron, B., & Gong, G. (1983) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.1983.10483087 · Cited by 3,229
Haake, F. (2010) · Springer series in synergetics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-05428-0 · Cited by 2,072
Fidelity for Mixed Quantum States
Jozsa, R. (1994) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500349414552171 · Cited by 1,911
The Theory of Quantum Information
Watrous, J. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316848142 · Cited by 1,325
Scalable multiparticle entanglement of trapped ions
Häffner, H., Hänsel, W., Roos, C. F., Benhelm, J., Chek-al-kar, D., Chwalla, M., Körber, T., Rapol, U. D., Riebe, M., Schmidt, P. O., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04279 · Cited by 1,249
Self-citationMeasuring entanglement entropy in a quantum many-body system
Islam, R., Ma, R., Preiss, P. M., Tai, M. E., Lukin, A., Rispoli, M., & Greiner, M. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15750 · Cited by 1,209
Quantum State Tomography via Compressed Sensing
Gross, D., Liu, Y.-K., Flammia, S. T., Becker, S., & Eisert, J. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.150401 · Cited by 1,133
Randomized benchmarking of quantum gates
Knill, E., Leibfried, D., Reichle, R., Britton, J., Blakestad, R. B., Jost, J. D., Langer, C., Ozeri, R., Seidelin, S., & Wineland, D. J. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.012307 · Cited by 1,019
Neural-network quantum state tomography
Torlai, G., Mazzola, G., Carrasquilla, J., Troyer, M., Melko, R. G., & Carleo, G. (2018) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0048-5 · Cited by 906
Exact and approximate unitary 2-designs and their application to fidelity estimation
Dankert, C., Cleve, R., Emerson, J., & Livine, E. R. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.012304 · Cited by 683
Probing Rényi entanglement entropy via randomized measurements
Brydges, T., Elben, A., Jurcevic, P., Vermersch, B., Maier, C., Lanyon, B. P., Zoller, P., Blatt, R., & Roos, C. F. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau4963 · Cited by 636
Self-citationNew Light on the Correlation Coefficient and its Transforms
Hotelling, H. (1953) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1953.tb00135.x · Cited by 546
Chaos and complexity by design
Roberts, D. A., & Yoshida, B. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2017)121 · Cited by 521
Experimental comparison of two quantum computing architectures
Linke, N. M., Maslov, D., Roetteler, M., Debnath, S., Figgatt, C., Landsman, K. A., Wright, K., & Monroe, C. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1618020114 · Cited by 508
Scalable noise estimation with random unitary operators
Emerson, J., Alicki, R., & Życzkowski, K. (2005) · Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4266/7/10/021 · Cited by 502
Direct Fidelity Estimation from Few Pauli Measurements
Flammia, S. T., & Liu, Y.-K. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.230501 · Cited by 449
Measuring Entanglement Growth in Quench Dynamics of Bosons in an Optical Lattice
Daley, A. J., Pichler, H., Schachenmayer, J., & Zoller, P. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.020505 · Cited by 393
Self-citationEvenly distributed unitaries: On the structure of unitary designs
Gross, D., Audenaert, K., & Eisert, J. (2007) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2716992 · Cited by 358
Practical Characterization of Quantum Devices without Tomography
Silva, M. P. D., Landon-Cardinal, O., & Poulin, D. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.210404 · Cited by 340
Out-of-time-order correlation for many-body localization
Fan, R., Zhang, P., Shen, H., & Zhai, H. (2017) · 中国科学通报：英文版 · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2017.04.011 · Cited by 322
Symmetrized Characterization of Noisy Quantum Processes
Emerson, J., Silva, M. P. D., Moussa, O., Ryan, C. A., Laforest, M., Baugh, J., Cory, D. G., & Laflamme, R. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1145699 · Cited by 259
Rényi Entropies from Random Quenches in Atomic Hubbard and Spin Models
Elben, A., Vermersch, B., Dalmonte, M., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.050406 · Cited by 258
Self-citationOut‐of‐time‐ordered correlators in many‐body localized systems
Huang, Y., Zhang, Y., & Chen, X. (2016) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201600318 · Cited by 248
Efficient tomography of a quantum many-body system
Lanyon, B. P., Maier, C., Holzäpfel, M., Baumgratz, T., Hempel, C., Jurcevic, P., Dhand, I., Buyskikh, A. S., Daley, A. J., Cramer, M., et al. (2017) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys4244 · Cited by 243
Self-citationQuantum fidelity measures for mixed states
Liang, Y.-C., Yeh, Y.-H., Mendonça, P. E. M. F., Teh, R. Y., Reid, M. D., & Drummond, P. D. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ab1ca4 · Cited by 203
Out‐of‐time‐order correlations in many‐body localized and thermal phases
Chen, X., Zhou, T., Huse, D. A., & Fradkin, E. (2016) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201600332 · Cited by 190
Elben, A., Vermersch, B., Roos, C. F., & Zoller, P. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.052323 · Cited by 168
Self-citation(2012) · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.110503 · Cited by 153
Experimental quantum compressed sensing for a seven-qubit system
Riofrío, C. A., Gross, D., Flammia, S. T., Monz, T., Nigg, D., Blatt, R., & Eisert, J. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15305 · Cited by 144
Self-citationProbing Scrambling Using Statistical Correlations between Randomized Measurements
Vermersch, B., Elben, A., Sieberer, L. M., Yao, N. Y., & Zoller, P. (2019) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.021061 · Cited by 121
Self-citationMeasuring the Rényi entropy of a two-site Fermi-Hubbard model on a trapped ion quantum computer
Linke, N. M., Johri, S., Figgatt, C., Landsman, K. A., Matsuura, A. Y., & Monroe, C. R. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.052334 · Cited by 115
Vermersch, B., Elben, A., Dalmonte, M., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.023604 · Cited by 109
Self-citationEfficient Quantum Pseudorandomness with Nearly Time-Independent Hamiltonian Dynamics
Nakata, Y., Hirche, C., Koashi, M., & Winter, A. (2017) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.7.021006 · Cited by 107
Experimental Estimation of Average Fidelity of a Clifford Gate on a 7-Qubit Quantum Processor
Lu, D., Li, H., Trottier, D., Li, J., Brodutch, A., Krismanich, A. P., Ghavami, A., Dmitrienko, G. I., Long, G., Baugh, J., et al. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.140505 · Cited by 65
Loschmidt echo in many-body localized phases
Serbyn, M., & Abanin, D. A. (2017) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.014202 · Cited by 42
Joint quantum-state and measurement tomography with incomplete measurements
Keith, A. C., Baldwin, C. H., Glancy, S., & Knill, E. H. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.042318 · Cited by 35
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.2307/2685844 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms
Bharti, K., Cervera-Lierta, A., Kyaw, T. H., Haug, T., Alperin-Lea, S., Anand, A., Degroote, M., Heimonen, H., Kottmann, J. S., Menke, T., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.015004 · Cited by 2,231
Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation
Daley, A. J., Bloch, I., Kokail, C., Flannigan, S., Pearson, N., Troyer, M., & Zoller, P. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04940-6 · Cited by 783
Self-citationQuantum certification and benchmarking
Eisert, J., Hangleiter, D., Walk, N., Roth, I., Markham, D., Parekh, R., Chabaud, U., & Kashefi, E. (2020) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-020-0186-4 · Cited by 436
Quantum simulation and computing with Rydberg-interacting qubits
Morgado, M., & Whitlock, S. (2021) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/5.0036562 · Cited by 370
The randomized measurement toolbox
Elben, A., Flammia, S. T., Huang, H.-Y., Kueng, R., Preskill, J. P., Vermersch, B., & Zoller, P. (2022) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-022-00535-2 · Cited by 460
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Elben, A., Vermersch, B., van Bijnen, R., Kokail, C., Brydges, T., Maier, C., Joshi, M. K., Blatt, R., Roos, C. F., & Zoller, P.
- Affiliations
- Austrian Academy of Sciences (AT)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2020-01-06
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 010504-010504
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2971898467
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16
- FWCI
- 8.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- H2020 European Research Council
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (741541, 817482, 731473)
- Simons Foundation (651440)
- Austrian Science Fund
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- quantum fidelity, quantum state purity, quantum simulators, quantum computing hardware, entangled states, trapped-ion quantum simulator
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
