Cited by 389Relativity and Gravitational TheoryCrystallography and Radiation PhenomenaNuclear physics research studies

Gravitational Red-Shift in Nuclear Resonance

Open access
Pound, R. V., Rebka, G. A.·1959·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

This article appears in the following collection:The Physical Review Journals Celebrate The International Year of LightThe editors of the Physical Review journals revisit papers that represent important breakthroughs in the field of optics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.3.439

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The gravitational redshift was confirmed in a lab experiment by Pound, Rebka and Snider, verifying the general relativity prediction with a relative accuracy of 10% (and later <1%).

    “It is only in 1959 that the gravitational redshift is confirmed in a lab experiment by Pound, Rebka and Snider [1, 2, 3, 4]. Two gammaray emitting iron nuclei at different heights were compared, verifying GR prediction with a relative accuracy of 10% (and later < 1%).”

    From Chronometric Geodesy: Methods and Applications (2019) · cites this paper as [2]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pound, R. V., & Rebka, G. A.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1959-11-01
Volume
3
Issue
9
Pages
439-441
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020453555
Cited by
389
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
17.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Crystallography and Radiation Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Nuclear physics research studies
Keywords
gravitational redshift, nuclear resonances, nuclear magnetic resonance, general relativity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review