Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Flatness of the Universe: Reconciling Theoretical Prejudices with Observational Data

Turner, Michael S., Steigman, Gary, Krauss, Lawrence M.·1984·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

Theoretical prejudices argue strongly for a flat Universe; however, observations do not support this view. We point out that this apparent conflict could be resolved if the mass density of the Universe today were dominated by (i) relativistic particles produced by the recent decay of a massive, relic particle species, or by (ii) a relic cosmological constant. Scenario (i) has several advantages in the context of galaxy formation, but must confront the problem of a young Universe.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.52.2090

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 228

Metadata

Authors
Turner, M. S., Steigman, G., & Krauss, L. M.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1984-06-04
Volume
52
Issue
23
Pages
2090-2093
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024372929
Cited by
228
References
3
FWCI
38.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flatness of the Universe: Reconciling Theoretical Prejudices with Observational Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.52.2090
The paper
Turner, M. S., Steigman, G., & Krauss, L. M. (1984). Flatness of the Universe: Reconciling Theoretical Prejudices with Observational Data. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.52.2090

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.