Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,002

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inferring statistical complexity

Crutchfield, James P., Young, Karl·1989·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

Statistical mechanics is used to describe the observed information processing complexity of nonlinear dynamical systems. We introduce a measure of complexity distinct from and dual to the information theoretic entropies and dimensions. A technique is presented that directly reconstructs minimal equations of motion from the recursive structure of measurement sequences. Application to the period-doubling cascade demonstrates a form of superuniversality that refers only to the entropy and complexity of a data stream.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.63.105

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,002

Metadata

Authors
Crutchfield, J. P., & Young, K.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1989-07-10
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
105-108
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075694080
Cited by
1,002
References
1
FWCI
20.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inferring statistical complexity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.63.105
The paper
Crutchfield, J. P., & Young, K. (1989). Inferring statistical complexity. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.63.105

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.