Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 231

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cesium atoms bouncing in a stable gravitational cavity

Aminoff, C. G., Steane, A. M., Bouyer, P., Desbiolles, P., Dalibard, J., Cohen-Tannoudji, C.·1993·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

A curved mirror for atoms was made from an evanescent wave, formed by internal reflection of a quasiresonant laser beam at a curved glass surface. A cold cloud of cesium atoms was dropped onto the mirror and observed to rebound more than 8 times. The mirror size and reflectivity were studied, and reasonable agreement with a simple theory obtained. With 800 mW of laser power and a mirror of 1 mm diameter, we observed up to 73% of the atoms returning after each bounce, the losses being mostly during the free flight between bounces.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.71.3083

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 231

Metadata

Authors
Aminoff, C. G., Steane, A. M., Bouyer, P., Desbiolles, P., Dalibard, J., & Cohen-Tannoudji, C.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1993-11-08
Volume
71
Issue
19
Pages
3083-3086
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986305457
Cited by
231
References
0
FWCI
13.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cesium atoms bouncing in a stable gravitational cavity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.71.3083
The paper
Aminoff, C. G., Steane, A. M., Bouyer, P., Desbiolles, P., Dalibard, J., & Cohen-Tannoudji, C. (1993). Cesium atoms bouncing in a stable gravitational cavity. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.71.3083

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.