The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Decoherence, Continuous Observation, and Quantum Computing: A Cavity QED Model
Open accessAbstract
We use the theory of continuous measurement to analyze the effects of decoherence on a realistic model of a quantum computer based on cavity QED. We show how decoherence affects the computation, and methods to prevent it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computations with Cold Trapped Ions
Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4091 · Cited by 3,733
Self-citationBell’s theorem without inequalities
Greenberger, D. M., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., & Zeilinger, A. (1990) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.16243 · Cited by 2,404
Two-bit gates are universal for quantum computation
DiVincenzo, D. P. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.51.1015 · Cited by 1,069
Realizable Universal Quantum Logic Gates
Sleator, T., & Weinfurter, H. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4087 · Cited by 515
Cited by
Electromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coherent media
Fleischhauer, M., Imamoglu, A., & Marangos, J. P. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.633 · Cited by 5,189
O'Brien, J. L., Furusawa, A., & Vučković, J. (2009) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.229 · Cited by 2,388
Quantum State Transfer and Entanglement Distribution among Distant Nodes in a Quantum Network
Cirac, J. I., Zoller, P., Kimble, H. J., & Mabuchi, H. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.3221 · Cited by 2,215
Self-citationQuantum Information Processing Using Quantum Dot Spins and Cavity QED
Imamog¯lu, A., Awschalom, D. D., Burkard, G., DiVincenzo, D. P., Loss, D., Sherwin, M., & Small, A. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.4204 · Cited by 1,995
Dipole Blockade and Quantum Information Processing in Mesoscopic Atomic Ensembles
Lukin, M. D., Fleischhauer, M., Cote, R., Duan, L. M., Jaksch, D., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.037901 · Cited by 1,631
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pellizzari, T., Gardiner, S. A., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1995-11-20
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 3788-3791
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2027926771
- Cited by
- 792
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 26.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decoherence, Continuous Observation, and Quantum Computing: A Cavity QED Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.75.3788
- The paper
- Pellizzari, T., Gardiner, S. A., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1995). Decoherence, Continuous Observation, and Quantum Computing: A Cavity QED Model. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.75.3788
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.