Cited by 639Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates

Deterministic Entanglement of Two Trapped Ions

Open access
Turchette, Q. A., Wood, C. S., King, B. E., Myatt, C. J., Leibfried, D., Itano, W. M., Monroe, C., Wineland, D. J.·1998·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We have prepared the internal states of two trapped ions in both the Bell-like singlet and triplet entangled states. In contrast to all other experiments with entangled states of either massive particles or photons, we do this in a deterministic fashion, producing entangled states on demand without selection. The deterministic production of entangled states is a crucial prerequisite for large-scale quantum computation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.81.3631

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In those post-selection experiments, the underlying state is factorizable and so is not truly entangled.

    “However, the underlying state is factorizable, and so is not truly entangled.”

    From Nonmaximally Entangled States: Production, Characterization, and Utilization (1999) · cites this paper as [18]

    On p. 1, the paper calls the earlier photon and massive-particle experiments studies of entangled states and says their processes were selectable rather than deterministic. It does not say their underlying states were factorizable or that the states were not truly entangled; its distinction is whether entanglement is generated on demand. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several optical experiments have controllably generated non-maximally entangled states via post-selection, i.e., selective measurement of a product state, after the state had been produced.

    “there have been several optical experiments where non-maximally entangled states were controllably generated via post-selection , i.e., selective measurement of a product state, after the state had been produced [18,19].”

    From Nonmaximally Entangled States: Production, Characterization, and Utilization (1999) · cites this paper as [18]

    The introduction (p. 1) says earlier photon-entanglement experiments involved random processes and were selectable rather than deterministic. It does not say those experiments controllably generated non-maximally entangled states, or describe post-selection as selective measurement of a product state after production. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]I. L. Chuang, N. Gershenfeld, and M. Kubinec, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 , 3408 (1998). I. L. Chuang et al. , e-print at quant-ph/9801037 (unpublished). D. G. Corey, M. D. Price, and T. F. Havel, e-print at quant-ph/9709001 (unpublished). D. G. Corey et al. , e-print at quantph/9802018 (unpublished). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turchette, Q. A., Wood, C. S., King, B. E., Myatt, C. J., Leibfried, D., Itano, W. M., Monroe, C., & Wineland, D. J.
Affiliations
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1998-10-26
Volume
81
Issue
17
Pages
3631-3634
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2593972252
Cited by
639
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 25
FWCI
48.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Keywords
trapped ions, deterministic entanglement, Bell states, singlet state, triplet state, entangled states, quantum computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review