Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Novel Length Scales in Nanotube Devices

Léonard, François, Tersoff, J.·1999·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We calculate the properties of $p\ensuremath{-}n$ junctions, $n\ensuremath{-}i$ junctions, and Schottky barriers made on a single-wall carbon nanotube. In contrast to planar bulk junctions, the depletion width for nanotubes varies exponentially with inverse doping. In addition, there is a very long-range (logarithmic) tail in the charge distribution, extending over the entire tube. These effects can render traditional devices unworkable, while opening new possibilities for device design. Our general conclusions should apply to a broad class of nanotube heterojunctions, and to other quasi-one-dimensional ``molecular wire'' devices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.83.5174

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 303

Metadata

Authors
Léonard, F., & Tersoff, J.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1999-12-13
Volume
83
Issue
24
Pages
5174-5177
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2031529148
Cited by
303
References
0
FWCI
10.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Novel Length Scales in Nanotube Devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.83.5174
The paper
Léonard, F., & Tersoff, J. (1999). Novel Length Scales in Nanotube Devices. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.83.5174

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.