Cited by 409Quantum optics and atomic interactionsQuantum Information and CryptographyCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates

Entanglement of Atomic Ensembles by Trapping Correlated Photon States

Open access
Lukin, M. D., Yelin, S. F., Fleischhauer, M.·2000·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We describe a general technique that allows for an ideal transfer of quantum correlations between light fields and metastable states of matter. The technique is based on trapping quantum states of photons in coherently driven atomic media, in which the group velocity is adiabatically reduced to zero. We discuss possible applications such as quantum state memories, generation of squeezed atomic states, preparation of entangled atomic ensembles, quantum information processing, and quantum networking.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.84.4232

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When the atom number is much larger than the photon number, the dark states represent elementary excitations of bosonic quasiparticles, i.e., the dark-state polaritons.

    “When the atom number is much larger than the photon number, the dark states represent elementary excitations of bosonic quasiparticles, i.e., the dark-state polaritons.”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Lukin et al., 2000

  • Two atomic ensembles can be entangled by storage of two entangled light fields (Lukin et al., 2000).

    “However, two atomic ensembles can be entangled by storage of two entangled light fields (Lukin et al., 2000).”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Lukin et al., 2000

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 409

Authors
Lukin, M. D., Yelin, S. F., & Fleischhauer, M.
Affiliations
  • Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2000-05-01
Volume
84
Issue
18
Pages
4232-4235
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2026046398
Cited by
409
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
20.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Server of Kaiserslautern University of Technology (Kaiserslautern University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Keywords
quantum correlations, quantum information processing, quantum networking, light-matter entanglement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review