Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,517

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum Interferometric Optical Lithography: Exploiting Entanglement to Beat the Diffraction Limit

Open access
Boto, Agedi N., Kok, Pieter, Abrams, Daniel S., Braunstein, Samuel L., Williams, Colin P., Dowling, Jonathan P.·2000·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

Classical optical lithography is diffraction limited to writing features of a size lambda/2 or greater, where lambda is the optical wavelength. Using nonclassical photon-number states, entangled N at a time, we show that it is possible to write features of minimum size lambda/(2N) in an N-photon absorbing substrate. This result allows one to write a factor of N2 more elements on a semiconductor chip. A factor of N = 2 can be achieved easily with entangled photon pairs generated from optical parametric down-conversion. It is shown how to write arbitrary 2D patterns by using this method.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.85.2733

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. A. Hawryliw, 1997, Microelectron. Eng., 35, 11, 10.1016/S0167-9317(96)00196-7 · doi:10.1016/s0167-9317(96)00196-7
  2. S. R. J. Brueck, 1998, Microelectron. Eng., 42, 145, 10.1016/S0167-9317(98)00032-X · doi:10.1016/s0167-9317(98)00032-x
  3. Lord Rayleigh, 1879, Philos. Mag., 8, 261, 10.1080/14786447908639684 · DOI · Paper page
  4. M. Born, 1980, Principles of Optics, 10.1017/CBO9781139644181 · DOI · Paper page
  5. E. Yablonovitch, 1999, Opt. Eng., 38, 334, 10.1117/1.602092 · DOI
  6. B. Yurke, 1986, Phys. Rev. Lett., 56, 1515, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.1515 · DOI
  7. M. Hillery, 1996, Quantum Semiclass. Opt., 8, 1041, 10.1088/1355-5111/8/5/009 · DOI
  8. T. Kim, 1998, Phys. Rev. A, 57, 4004, 10.1103/PhysRevA.57.4004 · DOI · Paper page
  9. A. Kuzmich, 1998, Quantum Semiclass. Opt., 10, 493, 10.1088/1355-5111/10/3/008 · DOI
  10. E. J. S. Fonseca, 1999, Phys. Rev. A, 60, 1530, 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.1530 · DOI
  11. J. P. Dowling, 1998, IEE Proc., Optoelectron., 145, 420, 10.1049/ip-opt:19982473 · DOI
  12. M. Göppert-Mayer, 1931, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig), 5, 273, 10.1002/andp.19314010303 · DOI · Paper page
  13. J. Perina, Jr., 1998, Phys. Rev. A, 57, 3972, 10.1103/PhysRevA.57.3972 · DOI
  14. C. K. Hong, 1985, Phys. Rev. A, 31, 2409, 10.1103/PhysRevA.31.2409 · DOI · Paper page
  15. I. H. Deutsch, 1993, Phys. Rev. A, 47, 3330, 10.1103/PhysRevA.47.3330 · doi:10.1103/physreva.47.3330
  16. T. E. Keller, 1998, Phys. Rev. A, 57, 2076, 10.1103/PhysRevA.57.2076 · DOI
  17. J. D. Franson, 1997, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 3852, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3852 · DOI
  18. J. D. Franson, 1999, Phys. Rev. A, 60, 917, 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.917 · DOI
  19. H. Watanabe, 1994, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. I, 33, 6790, 10.1143/JJAP.33.6790 · doi:10.1143/jjap.33.6790

Cited by

See all 1,517

Metadata

Authors
Boto, A. N., Kok, P., Abrams, D. S., Braunstein, S. L., Williams, C. P., & Dowling, J. P.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2000-09-25
Volume
85
Issue
13
Pages
2733-2736
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2152231616
Cited by
1,517
References
4
FWCI
34.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantum Interferometric Optical Lithography: Exploiting Entanglement to Beat the Diffraction Limit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.85.2733
The paper
Boto, A. N., Kok, P., Abrams, D. S., Braunstein, S. L., Williams, C. P., & Dowling, J. P. (2000). Quantum Interferometric Optical Lithography: Exploiting Entanglement to Beat the Diffraction Limit. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.85.2733

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.