Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 660

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Two-Photon Diffraction and Quantum Lithography

Open access
D'Angelo, Milena, Chekhova, Maria V., Shih, Yanhua·2001·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We report a proof-of-principle experimental demonstration of quantum lithography. Utilizing the entangled nature of a two-photon state, the experimental results have beaten the classical diffraction limit by a factor of 2. This is a quantum mechanical two-photon phenomenon but not a violation of the uncertainty principle.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.87.013602

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 660

Metadata

Authors
D'Angelo, M., Chekhova, M. V., & Shih, Y.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2001-06-14
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
013602-013602
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2165527773
Cited by
660
References
3
FWCI
24.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two-Photon Diffraction and Quantum Lithography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.87.013602
The paper
D'Angelo, M., Chekhova, M. V., & Shih, Y. (2001). Two-Photon Diffraction and Quantum Lithography. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.87.013602

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.