Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 333

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Optimizing the Encounter Rate in Biological Interactions: Lévy versus Brownian Strategies

Bartumeus, F., Catalan, J., Fulco, U. L., Lyra, M. L., Viswanathan, G. M.·2002·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

An important application involving two-species reaction-diffusion systems relates to the problem of finding the best statistical strategy for optimizing the encounter rate between organisms. We investigate the general problem of how the encounter rate depends on whether organisms move in Lévy or Brownian random walks. By simulating a limiting generalized searcher-target model (e.g., predator-prey, mating partner, pollinator-flower), we find that Lévy walks confer a significant advantage for increasing encounter rates when the searcher is larger or moves rapidly relative to the target, and when the target density is low.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.88.097901

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 333

Metadata

Authors
Bartumeus, F., Catalan, J., Fulco, U. L., Lyra, M. L., & Viswanathan, G. M.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2002-02-12
Volume
88
Issue
9
Pages
097901-097901
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1996326412
Cited by
333
References
0
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimizing the Encounter Rate in Biological Interactions: Lévy versus Brownian Strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.88.097901
The paper
Bartumeus, F., Catalan, J., Fulco, U. L., Lyra, M. L., & Viswanathan, G. M. (2002). Optimizing the Encounter Rate in Biological Interactions: Lévy versus Brownian Strategies. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.88.097901

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.