Cited by 111

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Measuring Forager Mobility

Brantingham, P. Jeffrey·2006·Current Anthropology

Abstract

Mobility plays a large role in generating the patterns of stone rawmaterial usage seen in forager archaeological sites, but how best to translate these patterns into a complete quantitative characterization of the organization of forager mobility remains a difficult problem. The number of potential variables involved, including rawmaterial quality and abundance as well as individual movement and technological decisions, makes it extremely difficult to analyze mobility independent of all other influences. This papers develops a formal model of forager mobility based on a wellknown stochastic process termed a Lvy random walk. When combined with neutral assumptions about how stone is procured and used, the model may be used to recover detailed quantitative information about the organization of forager mobility from rawmaterial transport distances. The model has clear behavioral interpretations in terms of levels of planning, risk sensitivity, and timeenergy optimization and thus provides several potential currencies for comparative studies of prehistoric mobility strategies. How other behavioral decisions such as rawmaterial selectivity and even social exchange of raw material might influence patterns of stone rawmaterial transport is also explored.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/503062

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. Aldenderfer S., Simulations in archaeology, ed. Jeremy A. Sabloff, 1149.
  2. 10.2307/3085499 · DOI
  3. 10.2307/280392 · DOI
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.109902 · DOI
  5. 10.1073/pnas.2137243100 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0278-4165(02)00007-7 · DOI
  7. 10.1086/jar.35.3.3629902 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.2307/279653 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Blades S., Aurignacian lithic economy: Ecological perspectives from southwestern France, 10.1007/b110584 · DOI
  10. Bordes, 2005, Foni Le BrunRicalens, and Franois Bon
  11. Boyd R., 1985, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  12. 10.1016/j.physa.2004.04.091 · DOI
  13. Bradbury P., 2000, Carr
  14. Brantingham P. J., 1998, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 5, 5798
  15. 2003, American Antiquity, 68, 487509
  16. Brantingham P. J., 2003, Chinese Science Bulletin, 48, 151016
  17. Brantingham P. J., 2004, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  18. 10.1006/jasc.1999.0456 · DOI
  19. Cashdan E., Evolutionary ecology and human behavior, ed. B. Winterhalder and E. A. Smith, 23766.
  20. 10.1023/A:1009560628428 · DOI
  21. Demars, 1989, Palo, 1, 1730
  22. Denny M., 2002, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  23. Desbois J., 1992, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 25, L762, 10.1088/0305-4470/25/11/017 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0305-4403(03)00081-5 · DOI
  25. FblotAugustins J., 1993, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 12, 21165
  26. 1997, Journal of Middle Atlantic Archaeology, 13, 5790
  27. La circulation des matires premires au Palolithique: Synthse des donnes, perspectives comportementales, 1
  28. La circulation des matires premires au Palolithique: Synthse des donnes, perspectives comportementales, 2
  29. Gamble C., The Palaeolithic societies of Europe
  30. Goebel T., The Early Upper Paleolithic beyond Western Europe, ed. P. J. Brantingham, S. L. Kuhn, and K. W. Kerry, 16295.
  31. Goodyear A. C., Eastern Paleoindian lithic resource use, ed. C. J. Ellis and J. C. Lothrop, 19.
  32. Gotelli N. J. G. G. R., Null models in ecology
  33. 10.2307/2801706 · DOI
  34. Hubbell S. P., The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography, 10.1890/04-0808 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0278-4165(02)00003-X · DOI
  36. 10.2307/3557031 · DOI
  37. 10.1086/jar.39.3.3629672 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 1992, Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 4366
  39. Kimura M., The neutral theory of molecular evolution, 10.1017/CBO9780511623486 · DOI
  40. Koponen I., 1995, Physcial Review E, 52, 119799
  41. Kuhn S. L., Mousterian lithic technology: An ecological perspective
  42. 2004, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 23, 4348
  43. 10.2307/2265616 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/S0375-9601(00)00059-1 · DOI
  45. Nelson M. C., 1991, Archaeological Method and Theory, 3, 57100
  46. Parry J., 1987, Kelly
  47. 10.1002/ajpa.20157 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Potts R., Early hominid activities at Olduvai Gorge
  49. RamosFernandez G., 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 55, 22330
  50. Rockman M., 2003, London: Routledge.
  51. Shackley M. S., Early Formative adaptations in the southern Southwest, ed. B. J. Roth, 516.
  52. 10.1038/363031a0 · DOI
  53. 10.1086/jar.42.1.3630378 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.jas.2004.11.012 · DOI
  55. 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13843.x · DOI
  56. Stephens D. W., 1986, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  57. Stirzaker D., Elementary probability. 2d ed
  58. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.10.006 · DOI
  59. 10.2307/2694532 · DOI
  60. The behavioral ecology of Folsom lithic technology. Ph. D. diss
  61. 10.2307/2265702 · DOI
  62. Historical dynamics: Why states rise and fall
  63. 10.1038/381413a0 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01157-3 · DOI
  65. 10.1038/44831 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1086/203789 · DOI
  67. Bracewell R. N., The Fourier transform and its applications, 10.1119/1.1973431 · DOI
  68. James J. F., A students guide to Fourier transforms. 2d ed
  69. 10.1126/science.1094442 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Brantingham, P. J.
Venue
Current Anthropology
Published
2006-06
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
435-459
ISSN
  • 0011-3204
  • 1537-5382
Cited by
111
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review