Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 609

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Distilling Gaussian States with Gaussian Operations is Impossible

Open access
Eisert, J., Scheel, S., Plenio, M. B.·2002·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We show that no distillation protocol for Gaussian quantum states exists that relies on (i) arbitrary local unitary operations that preserve the Gaussian character of the state and (ii) homodyne detection together with classical communication and postprocessing by means of local Gaussian unitary operations on two symmetric identically prepared copies. This is in contrast to the finite-dimensional case, where entanglement can be distilled in an iterative protocol using two copies at a time. The ramifications for the distribution of Gaussian states over large distances will be outlined. We also comment on the generality of the approach and sketch the most general form of a Gaussian local operation with classical communication in a bipartite setting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.89.137903

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 609

Metadata

Authors
Eisert, J., Scheel, S., & Plenio, M. B.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2002-09-04
Volume
89
Issue
13
Pages
137903-137903
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1509262151
Cited by
609
References
1
FWCI
15.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distilling Gaussian States with Gaussian Operations is Impossible. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.89.137903
The paper
Eisert, J., Scheel, S., & Plenio, M. B. (2002). Distilling Gaussian States with Gaussian Operations is Impossible. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.89.137903

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.