Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bell’s Inequalities and Quantum Communication Complexity

Open access
Brukner, Časlav, Żukowski, Marek, Pan, Jian-Wei, Zeilinger, Anton·2004·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We prove that for every Bell's inequality, including those which are not yet known, there always exists a communication complexity problem, for which a protocol assisted by states which violate the inequality is more efficient than any classical protocol. Violation of Bell's inequalities is the necessary and sufficient condition for quantum protocol to beat the classical ones.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.92.127901

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Brukner, Č., Żukowski, M., Pan, J.-W., & Zeilinger, A.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2004-03-22
Volume
92
Issue
12
Pages
127901-127901
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2171172588
Cited by
265
References
8
FWCI
10.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bell’s Inequalities and Quantum Communication Complexity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.92.127901
The paper
Brukner, Č., Żukowski, M., Pan, J.-W., & Zeilinger, A. (2004). Bell’s Inequalities and Quantum Communication Complexity. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.92.127901

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.