Cited by 60Advanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesChaos control and synchronizationVibration and Dynamic Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Complex Oscillations and Chaos in Electrostatic Microelectromechanical Systems under Superharmonic Excitations

De, Sudipto K., Aluru, N. R.·2005·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

In this Letter, the formation of complex oscillations of the type 2n M oscillations per period at the Mth superharmonic excitation is reported for electrostatic microelectromechanical systems. A dc bias (beyond "dc symmetry breaking") and an ac signal (at the Mth superharmonic frequency) with an amplitude around "ac symmetry breaking" gives rise to M oscillations per period or period M response. On increasing the ac voltage, a cascade of period doubling bifurcations take place giving rise to 2n M oscillations per period. An interesting chaotic transition (1-band and 2-band chaos) is observed during the first period doubling bifurcation. The nonlinear nature of the electrostatic force is shown to be responsible for the reported observations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.94.204101

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • OSAQSs have a certain amount of intrinsic robustness and built-in error correction due to the purely dissipative nature of the process, particularly clear for the OSAQS of quantum kinetic Ising models or Kitaev's toric code.

    “But, again due to the purely dissipative nature of the process, this type of simulation has a certain amount of intrinsic robustness and built-in 'error correction' - this is particularly clear for the OSAQS of quantum kinetic Ising models or Kitaev's toric code [173].”

    From Can one trust quantum simulators? (2012) · cites this paper as [173]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. S. G. Adams, 1996, Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International Workshop on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 1996, (MEMS ’96)
  2. J. Bienstman, 1998, Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual International Workshop on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 1998. (MEMS ’98)
  3. S. Liu, 2003, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, 2003

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
De, S. K., & Aluru, N. R.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2005-05-26
Volume
94
Issue
20
Pages
204101-204101
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2080045821
Cited by
60
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Chaos control and synchronization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
Keywords
complex oscillations, chaos, period-doubling bifurcation, DC bias, nonlinear electrostatic force, MEMS resonators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review