Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

OrthorhombicFdddNetwork in Triblock and Diblock Copolymer Melts

Tyler, Christopher A., Morse, David C.·2005·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

The phase behavior of ABC triblock and AB diblock copolymer melts is investigated by self-consistent field theory, while allowing for (among other candidates) the orthorhombic Fddd (O70) network phase identified in recent experiments with poly(isoprene-b-styrene-b-ethylene oxide) (ISO) triblocks. Predicted phase diagrams for triblocks similar to ISO contain an O70 phase bordered by gyroid, lamellar, and alternating gyroid phases, in agreement with experiment. The O70 network is also found to be stable in diblock melts within a narrow region that overlaps the weak segregation end of the gyroid region found in previous calculations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.94.208302

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 308

Metadata

Authors
Tyler, C. A., & Morse, D. C.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2005-05-24
Volume
94
Issue
20
Pages
208302-208302
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2028079037
Cited by
308
References
0
FWCI
7.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: OrthorhombicFdddNetwork in Triblock and Diblock Copolymer Melts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.94.208302
The paper
Tyler, C. A., & Morse, D. C. (2005). OrthorhombicFdddNetwork in Triblock and Diblock Copolymer Melts. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.94.208302

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.