Cited by 68Random lasers and scattering mediaQuantum optics and atomic interactionsQuantum Information and Cryptography

Spatial Quantum Correlations in Multiple Scattered Light

Open access
Lodahl, P., Mosk, A. P., Lagendijk, A.·2005·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We predict a new spatial quantum correlation in light propagating through a multiple scattering random medium. The correlation depends on the quantum state of the light illuminating the medium, is infinite in range, and dominates over classical mesoscopic intensity correlations. The spatial quantum correlation is revealed in the quantum fluctuations of the total transmission or reflection through the sample and should be readily observable experimentally.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.95.173901

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Investigations of nonclassical states of light through complex media have yet to realize the full potential of quantum walks, which require the ability to prepare arbitrary input states of the walkers.

    “Whereas the propagation of nonclassical states of light through such media has been explored theoretically and experimentally (23–27), these investigations have yet to realize the full potential of quantum walks, which require the ability to prepare arbitrary input states of the walkers.”

    From Two-photon quantum walk in a multimode fiber (2016) · cites this paper as [23]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. S. Feng, C. Kane, P. A. Lee, and A. D. Stone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 834 (1988).
  2. I. Freund, M. Rosenbluh, and S. Feng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2328 (1988).
  3. M. P. van Albada, J. F. de Boer, and A. Lagendijk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2787 (1990).
  4. F. Scheffold and G. Maret, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5800 (1998).
  5. B. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4733 (1999).
  6. A. Garcia-Martin, F. Scheffold, M. Nieto-Vesperinas, and J. J. Saenz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 143901 (2002).
  7. S. E. Skipetrov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 233901 (2004).
  8. A. A. Chabanov, M. Stoytchev, and A. Z. Genack, Nature (London) 404, 850 (2000).
  9. M. Patra and C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. A 59, R43 (1999).
  10. P. Lodahl and A. Lagendijk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 153905 (2005).
  11. L. A. Lugiato, A. Gatti, and E. Brambilla, J. Opt. B 4, S176 (2002).
  12. C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1829 (1998).
  13. M. Patra and C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. A 61, 063805 (2000).
  14. R. Berkovits and S. Feng, Phys. Rep. 238, 135 (1994).
  15. M. C. W. van Rossum and Th. M. Nieuwenhuizen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 313 (1999).
  16. R. Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light (Oxford University Press, New York, 2000).
  17. C. W. J. Beenakker and M. Bu ¨ttiker, Phys. Rev. B 46, R1889 (1992).
  18. Ya. M. Blanter and M. Bu ¨ttiker, Phys. Rep. 336, 1 (2000).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lodahl, P., Mosk, A. P., & Lagendijk, A.
Affiliations
University of Twente (NL)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2005-10-19
Volume
95
Issue
17
Pages
173901-173901
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2123479835
Cited by
68
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Acoustics and Ultrasonics › Random lasers and scattering media
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
multiple scattering, random media, light propagation, quantum fluctuations, reflection and transmission, quantum states of light

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review