Cited by 759Topological Materials and PhenomenaQuantum and electron transport phenomenaAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics

Helical Liquid and the Edge of Quantum Spin Hall Systems

Open access
Wu, Congjun, Bernevig, B. Andrei, Zhang, Shou-Cheng·2006·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

The edge states of the recently proposed quantum spin Hall systems constitute a new symmetry class of one-dimensional liquids dubbed the "helical liquid," where the spin orientation is determined by the direction of electron motion. We prove a no-go theorem which states that a helical liquid with an odd number of components cannot be constructed in a purely 1D lattice system. In a helical liquid with an odd number of components, a uniform gap in the ground state can appear when the time-reversal symmetry is spontaneously broken by interactions. On the other hand, a correlated two-particle backscattering term by an impurity can become relevant while keeping the time-reversal invariance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.96.106401

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If there are two Kramers pairs of edge modes, a right-mover can back-scatter to the left-mover that is not its time-reversal conjugate, and this process will in general eliminate these two Kramers pairs from the low-energy theory.

    “However, if we have two Kramers pairs of edge modes, then a right-mover can back-scatter to the left-mover that is not its time-reversal conjugate (62,63). This process will, in general, eliminate these two Kramers pairs from the low-energy theory.”

    From Three-Dimensional Topological Insulators (2011) · cites this paper as [63]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, C., Bernevig, B. A., & Zhang, S.-C.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2006-03-14
Volume
96
Issue
10
Pages
106401-106401
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1993499159
Cited by
759
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 66
FWCI
13.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Bulletin of the American Physical Society
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and electron transport phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
Keywords
quantum spin Hall effect, edge states, no-go theorem, time-reversal symmetry breaking, spontaneous symmetry breaking, backscattering, impurity scattering, interacting electrons, topological phases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review