Producing Cluster States in Charge Qubits and Flux Qubits
Open accessAbstract
We propose a method to efficiently generate cluster states in charge qubits, both semiconducting and superconducting, as well as flux qubits. We show that highly entangled cluster states can be realized by a "one-touch" entanglement operation by tuning gate bias voltages for charge qubits. We also investigate the robustness of these cluster states for nonuniform qubits, which are unavoidable in solid-state systems. We find that quantum computation based on cluster states is a promising approach for solid-state qubits.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There have been proposals to implement one-way quantum computation or create cluster states in solid state systems using superconducting circuits and quantum dots.
“In addition to these works, there have been a series of proposals how to implement one-way quantum computation (or to create cluster states) in solid state systems, using superconducting circuits 55 and quantum dots 56,57 .”
From Measurement-based quantum computation (2009) · cites this paper as [55]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Milburn, G. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35051009 · Cited by 5,880 · see citing works
Raussendorf, R., & Briegel, H. J. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.5188 · Cited by 4,477 · see citing works
Quantum-state engineering with Josephson-junction devices
Makhlin, Y., Schön, G., & Shnirman, A. (2001) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.73.357 · Cited by 2,476 · see citing works
Persistent Entanglement in Arrays of Interacting Particles
Briegel, H. J., & Raussendorf, R. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.910 · Cited by 1,950 · see citing works
Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states
Raussendorf, R., Browne, D. E., & Briegel, H. J. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.022312 · Cited by 1,655 · see citing works
Zanardi, P., & Rasetti, M. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.3306 · Cited by 1,315 · see citing works
Experimental one-way quantum computing
Walther, P., Resch, K. J., Rudolph, T., Schenck, E., Weinfurter, H., Vedral, V., Aspelmeyer, M., & Zeilinger, A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03347 · Cited by 1,273 · see citing works
Superconducting Circuits and Quantum Information
You, J. Q., & Nori, F. (2005) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2155757 · Cited by 1,002 · see citing works
Self-citationCoherent Manipulation of Electronic States in a Double Quantum Dot
Hayashi, T., Fujisawa, T., Cheong, H. D., Jeong, Y. H., & Hirayama, Y. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.226804 · Cited by 778 · see citing works
Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits
Yamamoto, T., Pashkin, Y. A., Astafiev, O. V., Nakamura, Y., & Tsai, J. S. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02015 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
Optical Quantum Computation Using Cluster States
Nielsen, M. A. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.040503 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
Charge-Qubit Operation of an Isolated Double Quantum Dot
Gorman, J., Hasko, D. G., & Williams, D. A. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.090502 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Charge Echo in a Cooper-Pair Box
Nakamura, Y., Pashkin, Y. A., Yamamoto, T., & Tsai, J. S. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.047901 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Concatenating Decoherence-Free Subspaces with Quantum Error Correcting Codes
Lidar, D. A., Bacon, D., & Whaley, K. B. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.4556 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Spectroscopy on Two Coupled Superconducting Flux Qubits
Majer, J., Paauw, F. G., ter Haar, A. C. J., Harmans, C. J. P. M., & Mooij, J. E. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.090501 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Fault-tolerant quantum computation with cluster states
Nielsen, M. A., & Dawson, C. M. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.042323 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Evidence for Entangled States of Two Coupled Flux Qubits
Izmalkov, A., Grajcar, M., Il’ichev, E. V., Wagner, T., Meyer, H. ‐., Smirnov, A. Y., Amin, M. H. S., van den Brink, A. M., & Zagoskin, A. M. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.037003 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Controllable Coupling between Flux Qubits
Liu, Y.-X., Wei, L. F., Tsai, J.-S., & Nori, F. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.067003 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Self-citationNoise Thresholds for Optical Quantum Computers
Dawson, C. M., Haselgrove, H. L., & Nielsen, M. A. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.020501 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Protocol for Universal Gates in Optimally Biased Superconducting Qubits
Rigetti, C. T., Blais, A., & Devoret, M. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.240502 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Munowitz, M. G. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Cluster states from Heisenberg interactions
Borhani, M., & Loss, D. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.034308 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Quantum-dot cluster-state computing with encoded qubits
Weinstein, Y. S., Hellberg, C. S., & Levy, J. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.020304 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Electric-field driven donor-based charge qubits in semiconductors
Koiller, B., Hu, X., & Sarma, S. D. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.045319 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum-information processing with noisy cluster states
Tame, M., Paternostro, M., Kim, M. S., & Vedral, V. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.012319 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Tokunaga, Y., Yamamoto, T., Koashi, M., & Imoto, N. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.030301 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
One- and two-dimensionalN-qubit systems in capacitively coupled quantum dots
Tanamoto, T. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.062306 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationDecoherence-free states for charge qubits under local nonuniformity
Tanamoto, T., & Fujita, S. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.085335 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [1]H. J. Briegel and R. Raussendorf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 , 910, 5188 (2001); R. Raussendorf, D. E. Browne, and H. J. Briegel, Phys. Rev. A 68 , 022312 (2003).
- [17]J. Q. You and F. Nori, Phys. Today 58 (11), 42 (2005).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Measurement-based quantum computation
Briegel, H. J., Browne, D. E., Dür, W., Raussendorf, R., & Van den Nest, M. (2009) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1157 · Cited by 1,090 · see citing works
Topological fault-tolerance in cluster state quantum computation
Raussendorf, R., Harrington, J., & Goyal, K. (2007) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/6/199 · Cited by 617 · see citing works
Fundamentals of universality in one-way quantum computation
Nest, M. V. D., Dür, W., Miyake, A., & Briegel, H. J. (2007) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/6/204 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tanamoto, T., Liu, Y.-X., Fujita, S., Hu, X., & Nori, F.
- Affiliations
- Toshiba (Japan) (JP)
- Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP)
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2006-12-06
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 230501-230501
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2066691414
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 10.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and electron transport phenomena
- Keywords
- cluster states, charge qubit, flux qubits, entanglement generation, solid-state qubits, superconducting qubits, semiconductor qubits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
