Photon-Mass Bound Destroyed by Vortices
Open accessAbstract
The Particle Data Group gives an upper bound on the photon mass $m<2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}16}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$ from a laboratory experiment and lists, but does not adopt, an astronomical bound $m<3\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}27}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$, both of which are based on the plausible assumption of large galactic vector potential. We argue that the interpretations of these experiments should be changed, which alters significantly the bounds on $m$. If $m$ arises from a Higgs effect, both limits are invalid because the Proca vector potential of the galactic magnetic field may be neutralized by vortices giving a large-scale magnetic field that is effectively Maxwellian. If, on the other hand, the galactic magnetic field is in the Proca regime, the very existence of the observed large-scale magnetic field gives ${m}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}1\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{kpc}$, or $m\ensuremath{\lesssim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}26}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A much stronger but very speculative constraint comes from observations of the magnetic field on galactic scales, which is m_A < 10^-59 g, or λ_A > 3 × 10^21 cm.
“A much stronger but very speculative constraint comes from observations of the magnetic field on galactic scales, which is m A < 10 -59 g, or λ A > 3 × 10 21 cm [52].”
From Electrodynamics on cosmological scales (2016) · cites this paper as [52]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Photon and graviton mass limits
Goldhaber, A. S., & Nieto, M. M. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.939 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Electrodynamics on cosmological scales
Li, L.-X. (2016) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-016-2028-3 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Adelberger, E., Dvali, G., & Gruzinov, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- New York University (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2007-01-04
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 010402-010402
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W1972118117
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Keywords
- photon mass, galactic magnetic fields, magnetic vortices, Higgs mechanism, large-scale magnetic fields
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review