Cited by 220Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum optics and atomic interactionsQuantum Mechanics and Applications

Robust Creation of Entanglement between Remote Memory Qubits

Open access
Zhao, Bo, Chen, Zeng-Bing, Chen, Yu-Ao, Schmiedmayer, Jörg, Pan, Jian-Wei·2007·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

In this Letter we propose a robust quantum repeater architecture building on the original Duan-Lukin-Cirac-Zoller (DLCZ) protocol [L.-M. Duan, M. D. Lukin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Nature (London) 414, 413 (2001)10.1038/35106500]. The architecture is based on two-photon Hong-Ou-Mandel-type interference which relaxes the long-distance stability requirements by about 7 orders of magnitude, from subwavelength for the single photon interference required by DLCZ to the coherence length of the photons. Our proposal provides an exciting possibility for robust and realistic long-distance quantum communication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.98.240502

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A robust implementation of a quantum repeater using atomic ensembles was proposed by Chen et al., (2007), Jiang et al., (2007), and Zhao et al., (2007).

    “A robust implementation of a quantum repeater using atomic ensembles was proposed by Chen et al., (2007;Jiang et al., (2007); and Zhao et al., (2007).”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Zhao et al., 2007

  • With the help of two-photon interference it eliminates the stringent requirement of long-distance phase stabilization.

    “With the help of two-photon interference it eliminates the stringent requirement of long-distance phase stabilization.”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Zhao et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, B., Chen, Z.-B., Chen, Y.-A., Schmiedmayer, J., & Pan, J.-W.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • TU Wien (AT)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2007-06-15
Volume
98
Issue
24
Pages
240502-240502
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2050035335
Cited by
220
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
24.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
quantum repeaters, entanglement distribution, long-distance quantum communication, remote entanglement generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review