Cited by 10Semiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesStrong Light-Matter InteractionsPhotonic Crystals and Applications

Electromagnetically Induced Exciton Mobility in a Photonic Band Gap

John, Sajeev, Yang, Shengjun·2007·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

It is suggested that an exciton in the engineered vacuum of a photonic-band-gap-quantum-well heterostructure exhibits electromagnetically induced anomalous quantum dynamics. The exciton is dressed by coherent emission and reabsorption of virtual photons near the photonic band edge and captured in momentum space, lowering its energy by 1-10 meV and lowering its effective mass by 4-5 orders of magnitude. The photonic band gap simultaneously enables strong coupling to confined optical modes and long exciton lifetime.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.99.046801

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The woodpile photonic crystal has a large complete photonic band gap of δω/ω = 21%, while the authors' photonic crystal has no complete photonic band gap.

    “In contrast, the frequency of a conventional PhC cavity state with woodpile-PhC cladding is much more sensitive to the thickness of the slab 42 (see inset of Fig. 4c and details in Methods), despite the fact that the woodpile PhC has a large complete photonic band gap of δω/ω = 21% while our PhC has no complete photonic band gap.”

    From Type-II Dirac photons (2017) · cites this paper as [42]

  • The frequency of a conventional photonic crystal cavity state with woodpile cladding is much more sensitive to the thickness of the slab.

    “In contrast, the frequency of a conventional PhC cavity state with woodpile-PhC cladding is much more sensitive to the thickness of the slab 42 (see inset of Fig. 4c and details in Methods), despite the fact that the woodpile PhC has a large complete photonic band gap of δω/ω = 21% while our PhC has no complete photonic band gap.”

    From Type-II Dirac photons (2017) · cites this paper as [42]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
John, S., & Yang, S.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2007-07-24
Volume
99
Issue
4
Pages
046801-046801
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2013067744
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Strong Light-Matter Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Photonic Crystals and Applications
Keywords
exciton mobility, photonic band gap, quantum well heterostructures, virtual photons, exciton lifetime, strong light-matter coupling, photonic band edge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review