Cited by 573Rare-earth and actinide compoundsPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismMagnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials

Superconductivity on the Border of Weak Itinerant Ferromagnetism in UCoGe

Open access
Huy, N. T., Gasparini, A., de Nijs, D. E., Huang, Y., Klaasse, J. C. P., Gortenmulder, T., de Visser, A., Hamann, A. +2 more·2007·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We report the coexistence of ferromagnetic order and superconductivity in UCoGe at ambient pressure. Magnetization measurements show that UCoGe is a weak ferromagnet with a Curie temperature T(C)=3 K and a small ordered moment m(0)=0.03 micro(B). Superconductivity is observed with a resistive transition temperature T(s)=0.8 K for the best sample. Thermal-expansion and specific-heat measurements provide solid evidence for bulk magnetism and superconductivity. The proximity to a ferromagnetic instability, the defect sensitivity of T(s), and the absence of Pauli limiting, suggest triplet superconductivity mediated by critical ferromagnetic fluctuations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.99.067006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The spin-fluctuation model for SCFP is similar to field-reinforced superconductivity observed in ferromagnetic superconductors UCoGe and URhGe.

    “Another proposed explanation is that SCFP is stabilized by ferromagnetic fluctuations2, similar to field-reinforced superconductivity observed in ferromagnetic superconductors UCoGe50 and URhGe51 (Fig. 4).”

    From Orphan high field superconductivity in non-superconducting uranium ditelluride (2024) · cites this paper as [50]

    The paper suggests that ferromagnetic fluctuations may mediate superconductivity in UCoGe (p. 1), but it does not report field-reinforced superconductivity there. Instead, its measurements state that a 1 T field suppresses superconductivity (p. 3). The citation attached to UCoGe therefore does not support the field-reinforcement claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • UTe2 strongly differs from the superconductors described by the spin-fluctuation model; these materials exhibit both long range magnetic order and low-field superconductivity which precede a field-reentrant superconducting phase.

    “However, UTe2 strongly differs from the superconductors described by the spin-fluctuation model; these materials exhibit both long range magnetic order and low-field superconductivity which precede a field-reentrant superconducting phase50,51”

    From Orphan high field superconductivity in non-superconducting uranium ditelluride (2024) · cites this paper as [50]

    The UCoGe paper reports bulk ferromagnetic order coexisting with superconductivity at ambient pressure (pp. 1, 4), supporting the magnetic-order and low-field-superconductivity parts. It does not report a field-reentrant phase in UCoGe: superconductivity is suppressed at 1 T (p. 3). Its discussion of field-induced superconductivity concerns URhGe instead (p. 4). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [10]B. Lloret, Ph.D. Thesis (University Bordeaux I, 1988).
  2. [15]T. Moriya, Spin fluctuations in itinerant electron magnetism (Springer, Berlin, 1985).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huy, N. T., Gasparini, A., de Nijs, D. E., Huang, Y., Klaasse, J. C. P., Gortenmulder, T., de Visser, A., Hamann, A., Görlach, T., & Löhneysen, H. V.
Affiliations
  • Van der Waals-Zeeman Institute (NL)
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2007-08-10
Volume
99
Issue
6
Pages
067006-067006
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2137673253
Cited by
573
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 31
FWCI
20.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Rare-earth and actinide compounds
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
Keywords
UCoGe, itinerant ferromagnetism, weak ferromagnetism, Curie temperature, ordered magnetic moment, superconducting transition temperature, ferromagnetic instability, spin-triplet superconductivity, defect sensitivity, uranium intermetallic compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review