Cited by 19Science Education and PedagogyEducational Methods and OutcomesInnovative Teaching Methods

Guiding students towards an understanding of the electromotive force concept in electromagnetic phenomena through a teaching-learning sequence

Open access
Zuza, Kristina, De Cock, Mieke, van Kampen, Paul, Kelly, Thomas, Guisasola, Jenaro·2020·Physical Review Physics Education Research

Abstract

In this work we present the application of design based research (DBR) methodology to conduct a systematic iterative study of the design and implementation of a teaching-learning sequence (TLS) on emf (electromotive force).This work is the final part of a broader study that started with the analysis of students' difficulties with emf in the contexts of transitory current, direct current, and electromagnetic induction.We complete our research by investigating to what extent students see emf as a cross-cutting concept.We establish the design parameters based on an epistemological analysis and the empirical data, and describe how we devised and implemented the first version of the TLS that takes 4.5 h of classroom time.We analyze the data obtained in the first implementation and describe the redesign process that resulted in a second version of the TLS that takes 1.5 h of classroom time.We conclude that both versions of the TLS effect a similar boost in student attainment of learning objectives compared to the control group.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevphyseducres.16.020110

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After fully standing still, the battery OCV is approximately equal to the battery balance EMF.

    “After fully standing still, the battery OCV (open circuit voltage) is approximately equal to the battery balance EMF.”

    From The Influence of Temperature on the Capacity of Lithium Ion Batteries with Different Anodes (2021) · cites this paper as [33]

    In “A. First version of the TLS (TLS1)” (page unavailable), the paper gives the battery relation ε − ir = terminal voltage; at zero current, this supports numerical equality between open-circuit voltage and emf. “B. Emf: A cross-cutting concept” also says emf and potential difference can have the same numerical value. The paper does not address the claimed condition of a battery having fully stood still or define a battery “balance EMF.” (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The battery balance EMF and battery SOC have a fixed monotonic non-linear functional relationship.

    “According to relevant research results, the battery balance EMF (electrodynamic force) and battery SOC have a fixed monotonic non-linear functional relationship [32,33].”

    From The Influence of Temperature on the Capacity of Lithium Ion Batteries with Different Anodes (2021) · cites this paper as [33]

    The paper’s “Emf: A cross-cutting concept” section defines battery emf as work done per unit charge, but does not address battery state of charge. Searches for SOC, state of charge, and a monotonic nonlinear relationship found no passage establishing the claimed relationship. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. H. D. Young, R. A. Freedman, and A. L. Ford, University Physics with Modern Physics (Pearson, Boston, MA, 2015), p. 1600.
  2. L. C. McDermott and P. S. Shaffer, Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introduc- tory electricity. Part I: Investigation of student understand- ing, Am. J. Phys. 60, 994 (1992). · DOI
  3. D. P. Smith, and P. van Kampen, Teaching electric circuits with multiple batteries: A qualitative approach, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020115 (2011). · DOI
  4. P. Mulhall, B. McKittrick, and R. Gunstone, A perspective on the resolution of confusions in the teaching of elec- tricity, Res. Sci. Educ. 31, 575 (2001). · DOI
  5. J. Guisasola, J. M. Almudi, and K. Zuza, University students' understanding of electromagnetic induction, Int. J. Sci. Educ. 35, 2692 (2013). · DOI
  6. M. R. Stetzer, P. van Kampen, P. S. Shaffer, and L. C. McDermott, New insights into student understanding of complete circuits and the conservation of current, Am. J. Phys. 81, 134 (2013). · DOI
  7. R. Chabay and B. Sherwood, Restructuring the introduc- tory electricity and magnetism course, Am. J. Phys. 74, 329 (2006). · DOI
  8. K. Zuza, J. M. Almudí, A. Leniz, and J. Guisasola, Addressing students' difficulties with Faraday's law: A guided problem solving approach, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 10, 010122 (2014). · DOI
  9. H. V. Mauk and D. Hingley, Student understanding ofinduced current: Using tutorials in introductory physics to teach electricity and magnetism, Am. J. Phys. 73, 1164 (2005). · DOI
  10. S. Stocklmayer and D. Treagust, A historical analysis of electric currents in textbooks: A century of influence on physics education, Sci. Educ. 3, 131 (1994). · DOI
  11. F. Reif, Generalized Ohm's law, potential difference, and voltage measurements, Am. J. Phys. 50, 1048 (1982). · DOI
  12. I. Garzón, M. De Cock, K. Zuza, P. Van Kampen, and J. Guisasola, Probing university students' understanding of electromotive force in electricity, Am. J. Phys. 82, 72 (2014). · DOI
  13. K. Zuza, M. De Cock, P. van Kampen, L. Bollen, and J. Guisasola, University students' understanding of the electromotive force concept in the context of electromagnetic induction. Eur. J. Phys. 37, 065709 (2016). · DOI
  14. L. C. McDermott and P. S. Shaffer, Tutorials in Intro- ductory Physics (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1998).
  15. D. Gil and and J. Carrascosa, Bringing pupils' learning closer to a scientific construction of knowledge: A perma- nent feature in innovations in science teaching, Sci. Educ. 78, 301 (1994). · DOI
  16. M. Meheut and D. Psillos, Teaching-learning sequences: Aims and tools for science education research, Int. J. Sci. Educ. 26, 515 (2004). · DOI
  17. J. Guisasola, K. Zuza, J. Ametller, and J. Gutierrez- Berraondo, Evaluating and redesigning teaching learning sequences at the introductory physics level, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13, 020139 (2017). · DOI
  18. M. W. Easterday, D. R. Lewis, and E. M. Gerber, Design- based research process: Problems, phases, and applica- tions (International Society of the Learning Sciences, Boulder, CO, 2014), pp. 317-324.
  19. J. Kalle, J. Lavonen, and V. Meisalo, Pragmatic Design- based research-Designing as a shared activity of teachers and researches, Iterative Design of Teaching-Learning Sequences (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2016), pp. 35-46.
  20. J. Martinez-Torregrosa, R. Limiñana, A. Menargues, and R. Colomer, In-depth teaching as oriented-research about seasons and the sun/hearth model: Effects on content knowledge attained by pre-service primary teacher, J. Baltic Sci. Educ. 17, 97 (2018), http://oaji.net/articles/ 2017/987-1519203761.pdf.
  21. C. Furió, J. Guisasola, J. M. Almudi, and M. Ceberio, Learning the electric field concept as oriented research activity, Sci. Educ. 87, 640 (2003). · DOI
  22. J. A. Acevedo-Díaz, Á. Vázquez-Alonso, M. A. Manassero- Mas, and P. Acevedo-Romero, Consensos sobre la natural- eza de la ciencia: fundamentos de una investigación em- pírica, Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las ciencias 4, 42 (2007). · DOI
  23. M. R. Matthews, Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science (Routledge, London, 1994).
  24. N. J. Nersessian, Should physicists preach what they practice?, Sci. Educ. 4, 203 (1995). · DOI
  25. H. Härtel, The electric circuit as a system: A new approach, Eur. J. Sci. Educ. 4, 45 (1982). · DOI
  26. R. N. Varney and L. H. Fisher, Electromotive force: Volta's forgotten concept, Am. J. Phys. 48, 405 (1980). · DOI
  27. R. W. Chabay and B. A. Sherwood, Matter and Inter- actions (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2011).
  28. R. H. Romer, What do "voltmeters" measure?: Faraday's law in a multiply connected region, Am. J. Phys. 50, 1089 (1982). · DOI
  29. J. Guisasola, Teaching and learning electricity: The relations between macroscopic level observations and microscopic level theories, in International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching (Springer, Dordrecht 2014), pp. 129-156.
  30. R. W. Chabay and B. A. Sherwood, Matter and Inter- actions (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2015).
  31. P. Cobb, J. Confrey, A. DiSessa, R. Lehrer, and L. Schauble, Design experiments in educational research, Educ. Res. 32, 9 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  32. F. Marton, Phenomenography-describing conceptions of the world around us, Instr. Sci. 10, 177 (1981). · DOI
  33. P. R. Heron, Effect of lecture instruction on student performance on qualitative questions, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 11, 010102 (2015). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zuza, K., De Cock, M., van Kampen, P., Kelly, T., & Guisasola, J.
Affiliations
  • University of the Basque Country (ES)
  • Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology (IE)
Venue
Physical Review Physics Education Research
Published
2020-08-03
Volume
16
Issue
2
ISSN
2469-9896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3046857954
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Physics Education Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Communities in ADDI (University of the Basque Country) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Dublin City University Open Access Institutional Repository (Dublin City University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Communities in ADDI (Universidad del Pais Vasco) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (PID2019-105172RB-I00)
  • Federación Española de Enfermedades Raras
  • Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (GIU19/071)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
Keywords
electromotive force, teaching-learning sequence, electromagnetic induction, transient current, direct current, crosscutting concepts, student misconceptions, physics curriculum design, instructional redesign, design-based research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review