The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Efficient and systematic calculation of arbitrary observables for the matrix product state excitation ansatz
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Numerical methods based on matrix product states (MPSs) are currently the standard for calculating the ground-state properties of (quasi-)one-dimensional quantum many-body systems. While the properties of the low-lying excitations in such systems are often studied in this MPS framework through by means of time-evolution simulations, we can also look at their by directly calculating eigenstates corresponding to these excitations. The so-called MPS excitation ansatz is a powerful method for finding such eigenstates with a single-particle character in the thermodynamic limit. Although this excitation ansatz has been used quite extensively, a general method for calculating expectation values for these states is lacking in the literature: We aim to fill this gap by presenting a recursive algorithm to calculate arbitrary observables expressed as matrix product operators. This method concisely encapsulates existing methods for—as well as extensions to—the excitation ansatz, such as excitations with a larger spatial support and multiparticle excitations, and is robust enough to handle further innovations. We demonstrate the versatility of our method by studying the low-lying excitations in the spin-1 Heisenberg chain and the one-dimensional Hubbard model, looking at how the excitations converge in the former, while in the latter, we present a refined method of targeting single-particle excitations inside a continuum by minimizing the energy rather than the energy itself. We hope that this technique will foster further advancements with the excitation ansatz.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 94 · Cited by 3
Research works printed but not linked: 90
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2863 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.10345 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.aop.2010.09.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.aop.2019.167998 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s42254-023-00572-5 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-040721-022705 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-physchem-032210-103338 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1137/090752286 · DOI
- 10.4171/mag/101 · DOI
- 10.1134/S1064562409050056 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00365-011-9131-1 · DOI
- 10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.040318 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.056501 · DOI
- 10.22331/q-2021-03-15-410 · DOI
- Y. A. Liu, 2021, Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.090502 · DOI
- 10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.010308 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.75.473 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.705 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.155124 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.235110 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.205130 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.240603 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.032306 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021040 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.115117 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.L060305 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.033021 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.235115 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.100402 · DOI
- 10.22331/q-2025-03-25-1670 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1742-5468/2007/10/P10014 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.045115 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3537 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.100408 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.080401 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.257202 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.125136 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.090603 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.235155 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.115142 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.075129 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.201111 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.165121 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.195109 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013078 · DOI
- 10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.020316 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.091903 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.054423 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033111 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.115138 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.235155 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.235156 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.085120 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.020402 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.045145 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1751-8121/aa6dc3 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.075133 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0031-8914(41)90422-6 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.94.262 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.102.1189 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.33.2481 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.531 · DOI
- 10.1137/0907058 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.115103 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.235140 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.247204 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.064427 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9601(83)90631-X · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1153 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.076401 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.134437 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.20.1445 · DOI
- F. H. Essler, 2005, The one-dimensional Hubbard model, 10.1017/CBO9780511534843 · DOI
- 10.1143/ptp/5.4.544 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.1704046 · DOI
- 10.1088/0022-3719/14/19/010 · DOI
- See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.023018 for the animation of the time-evolution simulation of the Hubbard model wave packets.
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.245107 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.035103 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.155116 · DOI
- 10.1088/0953-8984/27/42/425602 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031041 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.205155 · DOI
- 10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.1.006 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.195111 · DOI
- 10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.010335 · DOI
- 10.1137/20M1316822 · DOI
- N. J. Higham, 2002, Accuracy and Stability of Numerical Algorithms, 10.1137/1.9780898718027 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1137/23M1549079 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Osborne, J. J., & McCulloch, I. P.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- National Tsing Hua University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Osborne, Jesse J.
- Venue
- Physical Review Research
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2025-04-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2643-1564 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4409218451
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 1.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical Review Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science and Technology Council (112-2811-M-007-044, 113-2112-M-007-MY2)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
- Keywords
- matrix product states, matrix product operators, recursive algorithm, low-energy excitations, single-particle excitations, spin-1 Heisenberg chain, one-dimensional Hubbard model, thermodynamic limit, energy minimization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review