Cited by 152Quantum many-body systemsQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Mechanics and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficient Tensor Network Simulation of IBM’s Eagle Kicked Ising Experiment

Open access

Abstract

We report an accurate and efficient classical simulation of a kicked Ising quantum system on the heavy hexagon lattice. A simulation of this system was recently performed on a 127-qubit quantum processor using noise-mitigation techniques to enhance accuracy [Y. Kim ., Nature, 618, 500–5 (2023)]. Here we show that, by adopting a tensor network approach that reflects the geometry of the lattice and is approximately contracted using belief propagation, we can perform a classical simulation that is significantly more accurate and precise than the results obtained from the quantum processor and many other classical methods. We quantify the treelike correlations of the wave function in order to explain the accuracy of our belief propagation-based approach. We also show how our method allows us to perform simulations of the system to long times in the thermodynamic limit, corresponding to a quantum computer with an infinite number of qubits. Our tensor network approach has broader applications for simulating the dynamics of quantum systems with treelike correlations. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/prxquantum.5.010308

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the simulation of the kicked Ising experiment on the heavy-hex lattice, the shortest loops are length 12, and tree-tensor networks proved to be very fast and economical in computational resources since correlation lengths are relatively short.

    “For example, in the aforementioned simulation of the kicked Ising experiment on the heavy-hex lattice, the shortest loops are length 12, and tree-tensor networks proved to be very fast and economical in computational resources since correlation lengths are relatively short 16 .”

    From Beyond-classical computation in quantum simulation (2025) · cites this paper as [16]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • SU methods have been successfully applied for the simulation of a kicked Ising model on a heavy-hex lattice, which despite finite dimensionality (2) has a paucity of short loops.

    “SU methods have been successfully applied for the simulation of a kicked Ising model on a heavy-hex lattice for example, which despite finite dimensionality (2) has a paucity of short loops 16,94 .”

    From Beyond-classical computation in quantum simulation (2025) · cites this paper as [16]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1038/s41567-020-01109-8 · DOI
  2. 10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.020340 · DOI
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.030501 · DOI
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.180509 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/s41586-023-06096-3 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.aop.2007.10.001 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/s41467-022-35301-6 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/nphys3934 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.205137 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.035142 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.090603 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.147902 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.195105 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.134429 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.115137 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.023073 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1038/s41467-022-35090-y · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.134421 · DOI
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.195137 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.023073 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.081103 · DOI
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.085155 · DOI
  23. 10.1152/jn.2001.85.3.1220 · DOI
  24. 10.1137/141000671 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.4-r0.3 · DOI
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.250602 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1088/1367-2630/16/3/033014 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tindall, J., Fishman, M., Stoudenmire, E. M., & Sels, D.
Affiliations
Flatiron Institute (US)
Venue
PRX Quantum
Published
2024-01-23
Volume
5
Issue
1
ISSN
2691-3399 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391132757
Cited by
152
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 44
FWCI
23.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PRX Quantum (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Simons Foundation
  • AFOSR (FA9550-21-1-0236)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
tensor networks, classical simulation of quantum dynamics, belief propagation, thermodynamic limit, noise mitigation, quantum chaos

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review