Markov State Model Approach to Simulate Self-Assembly
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Computational modeling of assembly is challenging for many systems, because their timescales can vastly exceed those accessible to simulations. This article describes the multiMSM, which is a general framework that uses Markov state models (MSMs) to enable simulating self-assembly and self-organization of finite-sized structures on timescales that are orders of magnitude longer than those accessible to brute-force dynamics simulations. As with traditional MSM approaches, the method efficiently overcomes free energy barriers and other dynamical bottlenecks. In contrast to previous MSM approaches to simulating assembly, the framework describes simultaneous assembly of many clusters and the consequent depletion of free subunits or other small oligomers. The algorithm accounts for changes in transition rates as concentrations of monomers and intermediates evolve over the course of the reaction. Using two model systems, we show that the multiMSM accurately predicts the concentrations of the full ensemble of intermediates on timescales required to reach equilibrium. Importantly, after constructing a multiMSM for one system concentration, yields at other concentrations can be approximately calculated without any further sampling. This capability allows for orders of magnitude additional speedup. In addition, the method enables highly efficient calculation of quantities such as free energy profiles, nucleation timescales, flux along the ensemble of assembly pathways, and entropy production rates. Identifying contributions of individual transitions to entropy production rates reveals sources of kinetic traps. The method is broadly applicable to systems with equilibrium or nonequilibrium dynamics and is trivially parallelizable and, thus, highly scalable. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Nonparametric estimates of standard error: The jackknife, the bootstrap and other methods
EFRON, B. (1981) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/68.3.589 · Cited by 1,399 · see citing works
Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics
Chodera, J. D., & Noé, F. (2014) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2014.04.002 · Cited by 776 · see citing works
Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017) · Journal of the Medical Library Association · doi:10.5195/jmla.2017.88 · Cited by 715 · see citing works
Bowman, G. R., Beauchamp, K. A., Boxer, G., & Pande, V. S. (2009) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3216567 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
A Variational Approach to Modeling Slow Processes in Stochastic Dynamical Systems
Noé, F., & Nüske, F. (2013) · Multiscale Modeling & Simulation · doi:10.1137/110858616 · Cited by 327 · see citing works
On the Approximation Quality of Markov State Models
Sarich, M., Noé, F., & Schütte, C. (2010) · Multiscale Modeling & Simulation · doi:10.1137/090764049 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Suárez, E., Wiewiora, R. P., Wehmeyer, C., Noé, F., Chodera, J. D., & Zuckerman, D. M. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01154 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Folding kinetics and unfolded state dynamics of the GB1 hairpin from molecular simulation
De Sancho, D., Mittal, J., & Best, R. B. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct301033r · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Markov State Models of Millisecond Folder ACBP Reveals New Views of the Folding Reaction
Voelz, V. A., Jäger, M., Zhu, L., Yao, S., Bakajin, O., Weiss, S., Lapidus, L. J., & Pande, V. S. (2011) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2010.12.3015 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Trubiano, A., & Hagan, M. F.
- Affiliations
- Brandeis University (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review X
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2024-12-10
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 2160-3308 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4405239328
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical Review X (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (DMR 2309635, TG-MCB090163, DMR-MRSEC 2011846, OAC-1920147)
- Brandeis Center for Bioinspired Soft Materials
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
- Keywords
- Markov state models, self-assembly, self-organization, activation barrier, assembly intermediates, free energy profiles, entropy production, kinetic traps, nonequilibrium dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review