Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Polarization Measurements on Nuclear Gamma Rays

FAGG, LAWRENCE W., HANNA, STANLEY S.·1959·Reviews of Modern Physics

Abstract

A review of polarization-sensitive processes and different methods for measurements of polarization of nuclear gamma rays is given. Experimental results are presented in tabular form, the various processes being classified according to the type of orientation which is produced, either alignment or polarization. The possible polarization correlation for each case is listed. (C.J. G.)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/revmodphys.31.711

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
FAGG, L. W., & HANNA, S. S.
Venue
Reviews of Modern Physics
Published
1959-07-01
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
711-758
ISSN
0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971619379
Cited by
310
References
30
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polarization Measurements on Nuclear Gamma Rays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.31.711
The paper
FAGG, L. W., & HANNA, S. S. (1959). Polarization Measurements on Nuclear Gamma Rays. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.31.711

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.