Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 629

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Shapes of Inhomogeneously Broadened Resonance Lines in Solids

STONEHAM, A. M.·1969·Reviews of Modern Physics

Abstract

Inhomogeneous broadening has been observed in resonance lines in solids over the wide range of energies spanned by nuclear magnetic resonance, electron spin resonance, optical, and M\"ossbauer methods. The broadening arises from random strains, electric fields, and other perturbations from the defects in the lattice containing the centre whose transitions are studied. This paper reviews the calculation of the shapes of such resonance lines. The most important method used is the so-called statistical method. This method determines the line shape as a function of the distribution of the defects with respect to the centres studied, the density of the defects, and the perturbation fields of the individual defects. Emphasis is laid on the physical assumptions and approximations in this method and on its relation to other approaches. The theory is applied to a variety of broadening mechanisms, both in the widely used continuum approximation for the lattice containing the defects and in the more realistic discrete-lattice model. Two classes of experimental work are reviewed. The first deals with the ways in which resonance lines are recognised as being inhomogeneously broadened. These methods show that a wide range of phenomena can be used to check the theory of the line shapes. The second discussion of the experimental work compares theory and experiment for each of the various broadening mechanisms. These mechanisms include broadening by the strains from dislocations and point defects, by the electric fields and field gradients from charged defects, and by unresolved hyperfine structure. In each case theory and experiment are compared in detail for the system for which the most complete data are available. The conclusion is that the statistical method provides a satisfactory approach in all cases for which there are adequate data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/revmodphys.41.82

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 629

Metadata

Authors
STONEHAM, A. M.
Venue
Reviews of Modern Physics
Published
1969-01-01
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
82-108
ISSN
0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124878405
Cited by
629
References
0
FWCI
8.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shapes of Inhomogeneously Broadened Resonance Lines in Solids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.41.82
The paper
STONEHAM, A. M. (1969). Shapes of Inhomogeneously Broadened Resonance Lines in Solids. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.41.82

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.