The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preparation, measurement and information capacity of optical quantum states
Abstract
The preparation, or generation of coherent states, squeezed states, and photon number states is discussed. The quantum noise is evaluated for various simultaneous measurements of two quadrature components: heterodyning, the beam splitter followed by two single quadrature measurements, the parametric amplifier, the (degenerate and/or nondegenerate) four-wave mixer, the Brillouin and Raman amplifiers, and the laser amplifier. A quantum nondemolition measurement followed by a measurement of the conjugate variable is also categorized as a simultaneous measurement. It is shown that, for all of these schemes, the minimum uncertainty product of the measured variables is exactly equal to that required for a simultaneous measurement of two noncommuting variables. On the other hand, measurements of a single quadrature component are noise-free. Such measurements are degenerate heterodyning, degenerate parametric amplification, and cavity degenerate four-wave mixing and photon counting by a photomultiplier or avalanche photodiode. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle and the quantum-mechanical channel capacity of Shannon are discussed to address the question "How much information can be transmitted by a single photon?" The quantum-mechanical channel capacity provides an upper bound on the achievable information capacity and is ideally realized by photon number states and photon counting detection. Its value is $\frac{\ensuremath{\hbar}\ensuremath{\omega}}{(\mathrm{ln}2)kT}$ bit per photon. The use of coherent or squeezed states and a simultaneous measurement of two quadrature field components or the measurement of one single quadrature field component does not achieve the ultimate limit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
Cited by
Quantum information with continuous variables
Braunstein, S. L., & van Loock, P. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.513 · Cited by 3,858
Rationale and challenges for optical interconnects to electronic chips
Miller, D. A. B. (2000) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.867687 · Cited by 1,189
Ozawa, M. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.042105 · Cited by 419
Observation of amplitude squeezing in a constant-current–driven semiconductor laser
Machida, S., Yamamoto, Y., & Itaya, Y. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.58.1000 · Cited by 388
Self-citationMultiphoton quantum optics and quantum state engineering
Dell’Anno, F., De Siena, S., & Illuminati, F. (2006) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2006.01.004 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Yamamoto, Y., & Haus, H. A.
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1986-10-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1001-1020
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011103107
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preparation, measurement and information capacity of optical quantum states. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.58.1001
- The paper
- Yamamoto, Y., & Haus, H. A. (1986). Preparation, measurement and information capacity of optical quantum states. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.58.1001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.