The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics
Abstract
The interpretational problems of quantum mechanics are considered. The way in which the standard Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics deals with these problems is reviewed. A new interpretation of the formalism of quantum mechanics, the transactional interpretation, is presented. The basic element of this interpretation is the transaction describing a quantum event as an exchange of advanced and retarded waves, as implied by the work of Wheeler and Feynman, Dirac, and others. The transactional interpretation is explicitly nonlocal and thereby consistent with recent tests of the Bell inequality, yet is relativistically invariant and fully causal. A detailed comparison of the transactional and Copenhagen interpretations is made in the context of well-known quantum-mechanical Gedankenexperimente and "paradoxes." The transactional interpretation permits quantum-mechanical wave functions to be interpreted as real waves physically present in space rather than as "mathematical representations of knowledge" as in the Copenhagen interpretation. The transactional interpretation is shown to provide insight into the complex character of the quantum-mechanical state vector and the mechanism associated with its "collapse." It also leads in a natural way to justification of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and the Born probability law ($P=\ensuremath{\psi}{\ensuremath{\psi}}^{*}$), basic elements of the Copenhagen interpretation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox
Bell, J. S. (1964) · Physics Physique Fizika · doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195 · Cited by 12,252
A single quantum cannot be cloned
Wootters, W. K., & Zurek, W. H. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/299802a0 · Cited by 5,406
Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time- Varying Analyzers
Aspect, A., Dalibard, J., & Roger, G. (1982) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.49.1804 · Cited by 3,942
Experimental Test of Local Hidden-Variable Theories
Freedman, S. J., & Clauser, J. F. (1972) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.28.938 · Cited by 1,999
Quantenmechanik der Sto�vorg�nge
Born, M. (1926) · Zeitschrift f�r Physik · doi:10.1007/bf01397184 · Cited by 956
Macroscopic Quantum Systems and the Quantum Theory of Measurement
Leggett, A. J. (1980) · Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement · doi:10.1143/ptps.69.80 · Cited by 674
La mécanique ondulatoire et la structure atomique de la matière et du rayonnement
de Broglie, L. (1927) · Journal de Physique et le Radium · doi:10.1051/jphysrad:0192700805022500 · Cited by 460
Assessment of Everett's "Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Theory
Wheeler, J. A. (1957) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.29.463 · Cited by 254
Cited by
(2007) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 7,214
Lounis, B., & Orrit, M. (2005) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/68/5/r04 · Cited by 908
Getting Real: Technoscientific Practices and the Materialization of Reality
Barad, K. (1998) · differences · doi:10.1215/10407391-10-2-87 · Cited by 601
Research on hidden variable theories: A review of recent progresses
GENOVESE, M. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.03.003 · Cited by 477
Metadata
- Authors
- Cramer, J. G.
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1986-07-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 647-687
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974023876
- Cited by
- 855
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 6.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.58.647
- The paper
- Cramer, J. G. (1986). The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.58.647
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.