The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonlinear dynamics and breakup of free-surface flows
Abstract
Surface-tension-driven flows and, in particular, their tendency to decay spontaneously into drops have long fascinated naturalists, the earliest systematic experiments dating back to the beginning of the 19th century. Linear stability theory governs the onset of breakup and was developed by Rayleigh, Plateau, and Maxwell. However, only recently has attention turned to the nonlinear behavior in the vicinity of the singular point where a drop separates. The increased attention is due to a number of recent and increasingly refined experiments, as well as to a host of technological applications, ranging from printing to mixing and fiber spinning. The description of drop separation becomes possible because jet motion turns out to be effectively governed by one-dimensional equations, which still contain most of the richness of the original dynamics. In addition, an attraction for physicists lies in the fact that the separation singularity is governed by universal scaling laws, which constitute an asymptotic solution of the Navier-Stokes equation before and after breakup. The Navier-Stokes equation is thus continued uniquely through the singularity. At high viscosities, a series of noise-driven instabilities has been observed, which are a nested superposition of singularities of the same universal form. At low viscosities, there is rich scaling behavior in addition to aesthetically pleasing breakup patterns driven by capillary waves. The author reviews the theoretical development of this field alongside recent experimental work, and outlines unsolved problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(2014) · doi:10.1201/b17118 · Cited by 57,706
Electrospray Ionization for Mass Spectrometry of Large Biomolecules
Fenn, J. B., Mann, M., Meng, C. K., Wong, S. F., & Whitehouse, C. M. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2675315 · Cited by 7,634
Cited by
Seemann, R., Brinkmann, M., Pfohl, T., & Herminghaus, S. (2012) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/1/016601 · Cited by 1,049
Dripping to Jetting Transitions in Coflowing Liquid Streams
Utada, A. S., Fernandez-Nieves, A., Stone, H. A., & Weitz, D. A. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.094502 · Cited by 965
Microscale acoustofluidics: Microfluidics driven via acoustics and ultrasonics
Friend, J., & Yeo, L. Y. (2011) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.647 · Cited by 964
Surface acoustic wave microfluidics
Ding, X., Li, P., Lin, S.-C. S., Stratton, Z. S., Nama, N., Guo, F., Slotcavage, D., Mao, X., Shi, J., Costanzo, F., et al. (2013) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c3lc50361e · Cited by 926
Aerosol Emission and Superemission during Human Speech Increase with Voice Loudness
Asadi, S., Wexler, A. S., Cappa, C. D., Barreda, S., Bouvier, N. M., & Ristenpart, W. D. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-38808-z · Cited by 919
Metadata
- Authors
- Eggers, J.
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1997-07-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 865-930
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2126488447
- Cited by
- 1,817
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 28.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonlinear dynamics and breakup of free-surface flows. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.69.865
- The paper
- Eggers, J. (1997). Nonlinear dynamics and breakup of free-surface flows. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.69.865
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.