The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nobel Lecture: Defining and measuring optical frequencies
Abstract
Four long-running currents in laser technology met and merged in 1999--2000. Two of these were the quest toward a stable repetitive sequence of ever-shorter optical pulses and, on the other hand, the quest for the most time-stable, unvarying optical frequency possible. The marriage of UltraFast and UltraStable lasers was brokered mainly by two international teams and became exciting when a special ``designer'' microstructure optical fiber was shown to be nonlinear enough to produce ``white light'' from the femtosecond laser pulses, such that the output spectrum embraced a full optical octave. Then, for the first time, one could realize an optical frequency interval equal to the comb's lowest frequency, and count out this interval as a multiple of the repetition rate of the femtosecond pulse laser. This ``gear-box'' connection between the radio frequency standard and any/all optical frequency standards came just as Sensitivity-Enhancing ideas were maturing. The four-way Union empowered an explosion of accurate frequency measurement results in the standards field and prepares the way for refined tests of some of our cherished physical principles, such as the time-stability of some of the basic numbers in physics (e.g., the ``fine-structure'' constant, the speed of light, certain atomic mass ratios etc.), and the equivalence of time-keeping by clocks based on different physics. The stable laser technology also allows time-synchronization between two independent femtosecond lasers so exact they can be made to appear as if the source were a single laser. By improving pump/probe experiments, one important application will be in bond-specific spatial scanning of biological samples. This next decade in optical physics should be a blast.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jones, D. J., Diddams, S. A., Ranka, J. K., Stentz, A., Windeler, R. S., Hall, J. L., & Cundiff, S. T. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5466.635 · Cited by 2,661
Self-citationOptical Frequency Synthesis and Comparison with Uncertainty at the 10 -19 Level
Ma, L.-S., Bi, Z., Bartels, A., Robertsson, L., Zucco, M., Windeler, R. S., Wilpers, G., Oates, C., Hollberg, L., & Diddams, S. A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1095092 · Cited by 319
Base units of the SI, fundamental constants and modern quantum physics
Bordé, C. J. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2005.1635 · Cited by 124
Cited by
Ludlow, A. D., Boyd, M. M., Ye, J., Peik, E., & Schmidt, P. O. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.637 · Cited by 2,385
Coddington, I., Newbury, N., & Swann, W. (2016) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.3.000414 · Cited by 1,754
Frequency Ratio of Al+and Hg+Single-Ion Optical Clocks; Metrology at the 17th Decimal Place
Rosenband, T., Hume, D. B., Schmidt, P. O., Chou, C. W., Brusch, A., Lorini, L., Oskay, W. H., Drullinger, R. E., Fortier, T. M., Stalnaker, J. E., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1154622 · Cited by 1,450
Fermann, M. E., & Hartl, I. (2013) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.280 · Cited by 1,160
Rapid and precise absolute distance measurements at long range
Coddington, I., Swann, W. C., Nenadovic, L., & Newbury, N. R. (2009) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.94 · Cited by 1,059
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, J. L.
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2006-11-17
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1279-1295
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2059317334
- Cited by
- 614
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nobel Lecture: Defining and measuring optical frequencies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/revmodphys.78.1279
- The paper
- Hall, J. L. (2006). Nobel Lecture: Defining and measuring optical frequencies. Reviews of Modern Physics. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.78.1279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.