Cited by 3,283Advanced Chemical Physics StudiesTopological Materials and PhenomenaMachine Learning in Materials Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 524 of the 524 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 298 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Maximally localized Wannier functions: Theory and applications

Open access

Abstract

The electronic ground state of a periodic system is usually described in terms of extended Bloch orbitals, but an alternative representation in terms of localized ``Wannier functions'' was introduced by Gregory Wannier in 1937. The connection between the Bloch and Wannier representations is realized by families of transformations in a continuous space of unitary matrices, carrying a large degree of arbitrariness. Since 1997, methods have been developed that allow one to iteratively transform the extended Bloch orbitals of a first-principles calculation into a unique set of maximally localized Wannier functions, accomplishing the solid-state equivalent of constructing localized molecular orbitals, or ``Boys orbitals'' as previously known from the chemistry literature. These developments are reviewed here, and a survey of the applications of these methods is presented. This latter includes a description of their use in analyzing the nature of chemical bonding, or as a local probe of phenomena related to electric polarization and orbital magnetization. Wannier interpolation schemes are also reviewed, by which quantities computed on a coarse reciprocal-space mesh can be used to interpolate onto much finer meshes at low cost, and applications in which Wannier functions are used as efficient basis functions are discussed. Finally the construction and use of Wannier functions outside the context of electronic-structure theory is presented, for cases that include phonon excitations, photonic crystals, and cold-atom optical lattices.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review surveys the theory and applications of maximally localized Wannier functions (MLWFs), emphasizing the Marzari-Vanderbilt localization method and its use across electronic-structure problems. It covers chemical bonding analysis, electric polarization and orbital magnetization, Wannier interpolation, large-scale/strongly correlated calculations, and extensions to phonons, photonic crystals, and cold atoms.

Key findings

  • MLWFs give chemically intuitive localized orbitals: for Si and GaAs, the four valence bands yield four bond-centered sp³-like MLWFs, with the GaAs bond shifted toward the more electronegative As atom.
  • Wannier centers connect directly to Berry-phase electric polarization, and the Wannier representation was used to derive bulk formulas for orbital magnetization; in bcc Fe, the interstitial contribution to spontaneous orbital magnetization exceeds 30%.
  • Wannier interpolation reproduces fine band-structure features from coarse first-principles meshes, e.g. spin-orbit-coupled bcc Fe bands from an 8×8×8 q-grid, a metallic (5,5) carbon nanotube in a 100-atom supercell, and GW quasiparticle bands of SrTiO₃.
  • Anomalous Hall conductivities calculated with Wannier interpolation are tabulated as 753 S/cm for bcc Fe, −2203 S/cm for fcc Ni, and 477 S/cm for hcp Co via Berry curvature, compared with experimental values of 1032, −646, and 480 S/cm, respectively.

Methods

  • Review article synthesizing theory and applications of WFs/MLWFs; no new primary calculations are reported.
  • Covers construction methods including projection, maximal localization, disentanglement for entangled bands, Γ-point/supercell formulations, and Wannier interpolation.
  • Surveys applications in electronic structure, polarization/magnetization, transport, strongly correlated systems, and non-electronic contexts such as phonons, photonic crystals, and cold-atom optical lattices.

Limitations

  • The paper states that WFs are strongly non-unique, with no preferred gauge assigned by the Schrödinger equation; different localization criteria can produce qualitatively different representations of chemical bonds.
  • Local minima of the spread functional can yield non-meaningful localized orbitals, a problem more pronounced for entangled bands and usually alleviated by projection or better initial guesses.
  • The paper notes that chemical interpretation is most appropriate when MLWFs span the occupied subspace; including unoccupied states makes them a minimal tight-binding basis rather than necessarily bonding descriptors, and WF-based molecular dipoles are heuristic and not experimentally measurable even in principle.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/revmodphys.84.1419

Cites

524 of 524 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 298 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 201 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 132
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 119
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
222 of 222
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The band of interest is isolated, remaining separated by a gap from the bands below and above at all k.

    “For the moment, we suppose that this band is an isolated band, i.e., it remains separated by a gap from the bands below and above at all k .”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The independent-particle approximation is valid for describing the electronic ground state.

    “In the independent-particle approximation, the electronic ground state of a system is determined by specifying a set of one-particle orbitals and their occupations.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The Bloch functions on the right-hand side of Eq. (3) belong to a smooth gauge.

    “Henceforth we shall assume that the Bloch functions on the righthand side of Eq. (3) belong to a smooth gauge, since we would not get well-localized WFs on the left-hand side otherwise.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The Brillouin zone has been discretized into a uniform Monkhorst-Pack mesh, and the Bloch orbitals have been determined on that mesh.

    “In particular, we make the assumption that the BZ has been discretized into a uniform Monkhorst-Pack mesh, and the Bloch orbitals have been determined on that mesh.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The manifold of J bands remains separated by a gap from both lower and higher bands everywhere in the Brillouin zone.

    “consider instead a manifold of J bands that remain separated with respect to any lower or higher bands outside the manifold.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The calculations do not include spin-orbit coupling.

    “provided of course that the calculations do not include spin-orbit coupling”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most magnetic moments are fairly local.

    “Since most magnetic moments are fairly local, such an approach is generally expected to be reasonably accurate.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Strongly localized orbitals are those that suffer most from self-interaction.

    “Since strongly localized orbitals are those that suffer most from self-interaction, MLWFs can become an appealing choice to define Hubbard manifolds adapted to the chemistry of the local environment.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Ultracold atoms in optical lattices have advantages over solid state for studying quantum phenomena, including absence of lattice defects, absence of electron-phonon interaction, and precise control of inter-atomic interactions and optical lattice potential.

    “Indeed, they have a number of advantages over the solid state in this respect, such as the absence of lattice defects, the absence of a counterpart to the electron-phonon interaction, and the ability to control precisely both the nature of the inter-atomic interactions and the depth and periodicity of the optical lattice potential.”
9 of 9

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Items 401–524 of 524

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Ashcroft, N. W., 1976, Solid State Physics
  2. Fattebert, J.-L., 2003, Special Volume: Computational Chemistry
  3. Grosso, G., 2000, Solid State Physics
  4. Harrison, W. A., 1980, Solid State Theory
  5. Heine, V., 1980, Solid State Physics
  6. Vanderbilt, D., 2006, Conceptual foundations of materials properties: A standard model for calculation of ground- and excited-state properties
  7. Vuilleumier, R., 2006, Computer Simulations in Condens. Matt. Systems: from Materials to Chemical Biology

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3,283

Metadata

Authors
Marzari, N., Mostofi, A. A., Yates, J. R., Souza, I., & Vanderbilt, D.
Affiliations
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • Thomas Young Centre (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Ikerbasque (ES)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Reviews of Modern Physics
Published
2012-10-10
Volume
84
Issue
4
Pages
1419-1475
ISSN
  • 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-0756
OpenAlex
W2042938036
Cited by
3,283
References
524
Citations by year
2026: 274 · 2025: 389 · 2024: 371 · 2023: 343 · 2022: 278 · 2021: 295 · 2020: 333 · 2019: 214 · 2018: 212 · 2017: 149 · 2016: 130 · 2015: 116 · 2014: 94 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 6
FWCI
45.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
Keywords
maximally localized Wannier functions, unitary transformation, bonding analysis, electric polarization, orbital magnetization, Wannier interpolation, basis functions, phonon excitations, photonic crystals, periodic systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review