Cited by 144Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational Theory

On spontaneous wave function collapse and quantum field theory

Open access
Tumulka, Roderich·2006·Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Abstract

One way of obtaining a version of quantum mechanics without observers, and thus of solving the paradoxes of quantum mechanics, is to modify the Schrödinger evolution by implementing spontaneous collapses of the wave function. An explicit model of this kind was proposed in 1986 by Ghirardi, Rimini & Weber (GRW), involving a nonlinear, stochastic evolution of the wave function. We point out how, by focusing on the essential mathematical structure of the GRW model and a clear ontology, it can be generalized to (regularized) quantum field theories in a simple and natural way.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspa.2005.1636

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Assumption (Q) is manifestly violated by theories that postulate a modification of standard quantum mechanics, such as spontaneous and gravity-induced collapse models.

    “Assumption (Q) is manifestly violated by theories that postulate a modification of standard quantum mechanics, such as spontaneous16–20 and gravity-induced21–23 collapse models (cf. 24 for a review).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bell J.S, 1987, Schrödinger. Centenary of a polymath, pp. 41–52
  2. Bell J.S. 1987b Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  3. Bell J.S, 1989, Themes in contemporary physics, II, 1
  4. Pearle P, 1990, Vol. 226 of NATO ASI Series B, 193

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tumulka, R.
Affiliations
University of Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Tumulka, Roderich
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2006-03-24
Volume
462
Issue
2070
Pages
1897-1908
ISSN
  • 1364-5021 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2946
OpenAlex
W2171676563
Cited by
144
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 18
FWCI
3.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
spontaneous wave function collapse, quantum field theory, measurement problem, quantum ontology, regularization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review