The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Role of Ethylene and Wound Signaling in Resistance of Tomato to Botrytis cinerea
Open accessAbstract
Ethylene, jasmonate, and salicylate play important roles in plant defense responses to pathogens. To investigate the contributions of these compounds in resistance of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) to the fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea, three types of experiments were conducted: (a) quantitative disease assays with plants pretreated with ethylene, inhibitors of ethylene perception, or salicylate; (b) quantitative disease assays with mutants or transgenes affected in the production of or the response to either ethylene or jasmonate; and (c) expression analysis of defense-related genes before and after inoculation of plants with B. cinerea. Plants pretreated with ethylene showed a decreased susceptibility toward B. cinerea, whereas pretreatment with 1-methylcyclopropene, an inhibitor of ethylene perception, resulted in increased susceptibility. Ethylene pretreatment induced expression of several pathogenesis-related protein genes before B. cinerea infection. Proteinase inhibitor I expression was repressed by ethylene and induced by 1-methylcyclopropene. Ethylene also induced resistance in the mutantNever ripe. RNA analysis showed that Never ripe retained some ethylene sensitivity. The mutantEpinastic, constitutively activated in a subset of ethylene responses, and a transgenic line producing negligible ethylene were also tested. The results confirmed that ethylene responses are important for resistance of tomato to B. cinerea. The mutant Defenseless, impaired in jasmonate biosynthesis, showed increased susceptibility to B. cinerea. A transgenic line with reduced prosystemin expression showed similar susceptibility as Defenseless, whereas a prosystemin-overexpressing transgene was highly resistant. Ethylene and wound signaling acted independently on resistance. Salicylate and ethylene acted synergistically on defense gene expression, but antagonistically on resistance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ethylene as a modulator of disease resistance in plants
van Loon, L. C., Geraats, B. P. J., & Linthorst, H. J. M. (2006) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2006.02.005 · Cited by 623
Mengiste, T., Chen, X., Salmeron, J., & Dietrich, R. (2003) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.014167 · Cited by 553
The Role of Ethylene in Host-Pathogen Interactions
Broekaert, W. F., Delauré, S. L., De Bolle, M. F. C., & Cammue, B. P. A. (2006) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143440 · Cited by 503
Intervention of Phytohormone Pathways by Pathogen Effectors
Kazan, K., & Lyons, R. (2014) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.114.125419 · Cited by 488
PLANT-MEDIATED INTERACTIONS BETWEEN PATHOGENIC MICROORGANISMS AND HERBIVOROUS ARTHROPODS
Stout, M. J., Thaler, J. S., & Thomma, B. P. H. J. (2006) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151117 · Cited by 463
Metadata
- Authors
- Dı́az, J., ten Have, A., & van Kan, J. A. L.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-07-01
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1341-1351
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2109327750
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Role of Ethylene and Wound Signaling in Resistance of Tomato to Botrytis cinerea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.001453
- The paper
- Dı́az, J., ten Have, A., & van Kan, J. A. L. (2002). The Role of Ethylene and Wound Signaling in Resistance of Tomato to Botrytis cinerea. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.001453
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.