The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effects of Abiotic Factors on Induced Volatile Emissions in Corn Plants
Open accessAbstract
Many plants respond to herbivory by releasing a specific blend of volatiles that is attractive to natural enemies of the herbivores. In corn (Zea mays), this induced odor blend is mainly composed of terpenoids and indole. The induced signal varies with plant species and genotype, but little is known about the variation due to abiotic factors. Here, we tested the effect of soil humidity, air humidity, temperature, light, and fertilization rate on the emission of induced volatiles in young corn plants. Each factor was tested separately under constant conditions for the other factors. Plants released more when standing in dry soil than in wet soil, whereas for air humidity, the optimal release was found at around 60% relative humidity. Temperatures between 22°C and 27°C led to a higher emission than lower or higher temperatures. Light intensity had a dramatic effect. The emission of volatiles did not occur in the dark and increased steadily with an increase in the light intensity. An experiment with an unnatural light-dark cycle showed that the release was fully photophase dependent. Fertilization also had a strong positive effect; the emission of volatiles was minimal when plants were grown under low nutrition, even when results were corrected for plant biomass. Changes in all abiotic factors caused small but significant changes in the relative ratios among the different compounds (quality) in the induced odor blends, except for air humidity. Hence, climatic conditions and nutrient availability can be important factors in determining the intensity and variability in the release of induced plant volatiles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metabolic costs of terpenoid accumulation in higher plants
Gershenzon, J. (1994) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf02059810 · Cited by 522
Cited by
Impact of Extreme Temperatures on Parasitoids in a Climate Change Perspective
Hance, T., van Baaren, J., Vernon, P., & Boivin, G. (2007) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091333 · Cited by 709
Mild versus severe stress and BVOCs: thresholds, priming and consequences
Niinemets, Ü. (2010) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.008 · Cited by 379
Climate Change: Resetting Plant-Insect Interactions
DeLucia, E. H., Nabity, P. D., Zavala, J. A., & Berenbaum, M. R. (2012) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.112.204750 · Cited by 375
Sites of synthesis, biochemistry and functional role of plant volatiles
Maffei, M. E. (2010) · South African Journal of Botany · doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2010.03.003 · Cited by 342
Chemical ecology and conservation biological control
Khan, Z. R., James, D. G., Midega, C. A. O., & Pickett, J. A. (2008) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.11.009 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Gouinguené, S. P., & Turlings, T. C. J.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-07-01
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1296-1307
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2000996508
- Cited by
- 613
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects of Abiotic Factors on Induced Volatile Emissions in Corn Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.001941
- The paper
- Gouinguené, S. P., & Turlings, T. C. J. (2002). The Effects of Abiotic Factors on Induced Volatile Emissions in Corn Plants. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.001941
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.