The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Starch Synthesis in Arabidopsis. Granule Synthesis, Composition, and Structure
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this work was to characterize starch synthesis, composition, and granule structure in Arabidopsis leaves. First, the potential role of starch-degrading enzymes during starch accumulation was investigated. To discover whether simultaneous synthesis and degradation of starch occurred during net accumulation, starch was labeled by supplying (14)CO(2) to intact, photosynthesizing plants. Release of this label from starch was monitored during a chase period in air, using different light intensities to vary the net rate of starch synthesis. No release of label was detected unless there was net degradation of starch during the chase. Similar experiments were performed on a mutant line (dbe1) that accumulates the soluble polysaccharide, phytoglycogen. Label was not released from phytoglycogen during the chase indicating that, even when in a soluble form, glucan is not appreciably degraded during accumulation. Second, the effect on starch composition of growth conditions and mutations causing starch accumulation was studied. An increase in starch content correlated with an increased amylose content of the starch and with an increase in the ratio of granule-bound starch synthase to soluble starch synthase activity. Third, the structural organization and morphology of Arabidopsis starch granules was studied. The starch granules were birefringent, indicating a radial organization of the polymers, and x-ray scatter analyses revealed that granules contained alternating crystalline and amorphous lamellae with a periodicity of 9 nm. Granules from the wild type and the high-starch mutant sex1 were flattened and discoid, whereas those of the high-starch mutant sex4 were larger and more rounded. These larger granules contained "growth rings" with a periodicity of 200 to 300 nm. We conclude that leaf starch is synthesized without appreciable turnover and comprises similar polymers and contains similar levels of molecular organization to storage starches, making Arabidopsis an excellent model system for studying granule biosynthesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Starch: its metabolism, evolution, and biotechnological modification in plants
Zeeman, S. C., Kossmann, J., & Smith, A. M. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112301 · Cited by 1,095
Self-citationSmith, A. M., Zeeman, S. C., & Smith, S. M. (2005) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144257 · Cited by 522
Self-citationThe diurnal metabolism of leaf starch
Zeeman, S. C., Smith, S. M., & Smith, A. M. (2007) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20061393 · Cited by 443
Self-citationFormation of starch in plant cells
Pfister, B., & Zeeman, S. C. (2016) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-016-2250-x · Cited by 423
Self-citationRecent developments in understanding the regulation of starch metabolism in higher plants
Tetlow, I. J. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erh248 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Zeeman, S. C., Tiessen, A., Pilling, E., Kato, K. L., Donald, A. M., & Smith, A. M.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-06-01
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 516-529
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2132626957
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Starch Synthesis in Arabidopsis. Granule Synthesis, Composition, and Structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.003756
- The paper
- Zeeman, S. C., Tiessen, A., Pilling, E., Kato, K. L., Donald, A. M., & Smith, A. M. (2002). Starch Synthesis in Arabidopsis. Granule Synthesis, Composition, and Structure. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.003756
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.